Gettysburg PA? 
That's American throwball?
Amauri's market value right now: 5-7 million.
That's American throwball?Amauri's market value right now: 5-7 million.
Buy on AliExpress.com
Amauri "The Immovable Object" Carvalho de Oliveira (34 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
Gettysburg PA? That's American throwball?
Amauri's market value right now: 5-7 million.
That's American throwball?Amauri's market value right now: 5-7 million.
Right now, I would straight swap Amauri for Miccoli, without blinking an eye. If only Miccoli wasn't such a cunt. 
Amauri is not a "great player".
if anything, he has proven that he is an average player. there is nothing unique/extraodinary about him or his career thus far and he's almost 30 (in about a 1.5 years).
one word says it all -- overrated
WTF is 'American throwball' ?
but he's a juventino c*nt
Amauri is not a "great player".
if anything, he has proven that he is an average player. there is nothing unique/extraodinary about him or his career thus far and he's almost 30 (in about a 1.5 years).
one word says it all -- overrated
but he's a juventino c*nt
Amauri is not a "great player".
if anything, he has proven that he is an average player. there is nothing unique/extraodinary about him or his career thus far and he's almost 30 (in about a 1.5 years).
one word says it all -- overrated
i never said that i don't like Amauri. but the facts are facts. his track record was great at Palermo but he's done of consequence here at Juventus to warrant any applaud.
Trezeguet has disappointed on many an occasion and i have blasted him when he has. but the fact of the matter is that David is still a better overall player than Amauri. The stats prove it. Take a few years off of David's career and he still ranks higher than Amauri.
btw, i don't see why the both of you brought Trezeguet's name into this. Maybe if i change my avatar then you will come up with avenue to make a point.
i'm a team fan, not a fan of player who happens to play for Juve. so when a player is not performing well or meet standards then he is subject to criticism on any fan board. and i criticize them all when necessary.
Trezeguet has disappointed on many an occasion and i have blasted him when he has. but the fact of the matter is that David is still a better overall player than Amauri. The stats prove it. Take a few years off of David's career and he still ranks higher than Amauri.
btw, i don't see why the both of you brought Trezeguet's name into this. Maybe if i change my avatar then you will come up with avenue to make a point.
i'm a team fan, not a fan of player who happens to play for Juve. so when a player is not performing well or meet standards then he is subject to criticism on any fan board. and i criticize them all when necessary.
He is not hating on Amauri, but there is no arguing that Trez is a Juventus legend and his contribution far exceeds anything Amauri has done for this club.
Amauri is a very good player, but indeed he is overrated by some people here. His performances and goal scoring ratio, given his value, his attributes, physical presence, and potential are disappointing to say the least.
Amauri is a very good player, but indeed he is overrated by some people here. His performances and goal scoring ratio, given his value, his attributes, physical presence, and potential are disappointing to say the least.
You're missing the point, but that's not surprising. Nobody is saying Amauri is better than Trezeguet.
And you're also wrong in that Amauri doesn't bring any unique talents to the pitch. He's a much more power, threatening player than Trezeguet in everything except shooting, having the ability to pull defenders away from other attackers.
And you're also wrong in that Amauri doesn't bring any unique talents to the pitch. He's a much more power, threatening player than Trezeguet in everything except shooting, having the ability to pull defenders away from other attackers.
I am not missing the point. 
If you read my post carefully, it would appear that I am in agreement with you, as I state that Amauri, given these attributes, should be a much better player and should be able to contribute far more to our cause.
Amauri is the better forward, but Trez is the better finisher.
If you read my post carefully, it would appear that I am in agreement with you, as I state that Amauri, given these attributes, should be a much better player and should be able to contribute far more to our cause.
Amauri is the better forward, but Trez is the better finisher.
i know that nobody is saying that Amauri is better than Trezeguet. you brought him into the discussion not me.
and you can rate Amauri's intangibles as high as you please but the truth is that it hasn't really helped us much. i recognize that he is great on the ball and can supply the ball creatively but he hasn't been effective as expected.
and you can rate Amauri's intangibles as high as you please but the truth is that it hasn't really helped us much. i recognize that he is great on the ball and can supply the ball creatively but he hasn't been effective as expected.