Amauri Carvalho de Oliveira (20 Viewers)

At what cost would you be ok with Amauri?

  • Giovinco + cash

  • De Ceglie + Criscito + cash

  • De Ceglie + Criscito + Giovinco

  • Nocerino + Almiron + Marchionni

  • Almiron + Marchionni + cash

  • Fuck no, don't want him at all

  • Almiron+cash


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,629
yeah, let's buy a 28 year old guy that's not much better than Iaquinta and start him in front of a Del Piero who's playing like he's 25.

Huntelaar won't start if he goes to any other big club in Europe right away so our board should do everything to get him or they're a bunch of dumbasses. Trez won't last forever and The Hunter is the ideal replacement. End of story.
 

Luca

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2007
12,750
yeah, let's buy a 28 year old guy that's not much better than Iaquinta and start him in front of a Del Piero who's playing like he's 25.

Huntelaar won't start if he goes to any other big club in Europe right away so our board should do everything to get him or they're a bunch of dumbasses. Trez won't last forever and The Hunter is the ideal replacement. End of story.
:agree: I think trez needs a replacement because he is out of form a lot more often that DP plus I still think palla is good in that role
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
Giovinco + 19 mil would be the worst possible deal ever!!!
Spend all that money for a place we dont need enforcement and give away our future...
No wonder why are looking for free players like Kewell (and Flamini)...
and no wonder we are not buying any other defenders, other than, the free Mellberg...
 

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
82,842
i don't think our board would sell the farm for a player like amauri. but i do believe that they could get the deal done for a reasonable exchange
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
sub not for long though.

what about 15m+our best youngsters for a 28-29 injury prone/8 goals per year player?
what is not for long?

Trez is not an an energetic player. He is does not have pace . He only knows how to finish. You don't lose that ability with age, and since he lacks pace and energy, we don't have to w orry about that either. A 34 year old Trez won't be that much different than this current one. So Huntelaar would have to wait say 3 years before he becomes a regular. So he would be around 28, 29. Yeah, Let's see how willing he is to wait that long and risk his World cup and Euro chances.

About your second point. What are you trying to prove? We don't know how much the offer is for sure, and we don't know if any players at all will be part of the trade so anything you say about the deal is hypothetical. And age is nor a problem here. 28 years old? So he has at least 4 years of top football in him. 4 years could mean 2 titles and a CL. Why not then? Especially considering that he has attributes of all our strikers in him.

and all this hype about Huntelaar is annoying. The easiest market to find players in is strikers. There has never been a shortage of good strikers in recent history. And alot of them go for cheap before they become big. Losing out on Huntelaar is not big deal since there will always be other good ones that will pop up. On the other hand, the number of good CBs and fullbacks is very rare. Hence why I would rather not splash heavy money on a sub striker when there are rare gems like Zapata waiting around
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
i don't think our board would sell the farm for a player like amauri. but i do believe that they could get the deal done for a reasonable exchange
How can you expect a reasonable deal from unreasonable people??
The whole deal makes no sense at all, Amauri should be signed in the first place.
There are places were we need cover and first team choices and yet we are not interested to reinforce.
Just look at the past transfer choices we made and tell me what makes sense out of it???
Our managers act like immature, but excited high school kids!
 

Luca

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2007
12,750
what is not for long?
I think when trez is out of form as he has been, he should be replaced by an able striker, goals are his only cotribution so what is the point of having him on the pitch if we can't score any? So Huntelaar would be given a chance
 

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
82,842
How can you expect a reasonable deal from unreasonable people??
The whole deal makes no sense at all, Amauri should be signed in the first place.
There are places were we need cover and first team choices and yet we are not interested to reinforce.
Just look at the past transfer choices we made and tell me what makes sense out of it???
Our managers act like immature, but excited high school kids!
I'm gonna assume that you mean he should NOT be signed in the first place. I do agree that we need to fill other positions/roles on our squad and our offseason attention should be focused on that issue but we also do need a striker which falls into the same issue. Amauri is most coveted free agent on the market and I do believe if we acquire him it will improve this club exponentially.

But I do feel that we should not sell overpay for one player and miss out on other opportunities at the same time. Yes our board acts irrational at times and most of the decisions they have made in the past 1.5 years are more than questionable. But we are stuck with this board and we need to have faith in their judgement because I do believe they are doing what they can to build us back to championship form.

They do get paid the big bucks to do this you know :p
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
But does he after all DP has done for this club. All the rans we annoyed when DP was sub in capello era for ibra, so i don't think much will have changed + Amauri is nowhere near a good as ibra.
Pay attention:

Del Piero is not bigger than Juventus. Juve always comes first. It's very simple, if Amauri or any of our forwards is playing better than Trez or Ale then that forward should should start. No 2 ways about it. No one is his right mind can deny Ale's infleunce on Juve. But at the end of the day, if someone is playing better, then I expect that payer to start.

And the reason all the fans were annoyed when Ibra started was because he was playing like crap while DP was on fire. That is all.
 

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,629
what is not for long?

Trez is not an an energetic player. He is does not have pace . He only knows how to finish. You don't lose that ability with age, and since he lacks pace and energy, we don't have to w orry about that either. A 34 year old Trez won't be that much different than this current one. So Huntelaar would have to wait say 3 years before he becomes a regular. So he would be around 28, 29. Yeah, Let's see how willing he is to wait that long and risk his World cup and Euro chances.

About your second point. What are you trying to prove? We don't know how much the offer is for sure, and we don't know if any players at all will be part of the trade so anything you say about the deal is hypothetical. And age is nor a problem here. 28 years old? So he has at least 4 years of top football in him. 4 years could mean 2 titles and a CL. Why not then? Especially considering that he has attributes of all our strikers in him.

and all this hype about Huntelaar is annoying. The easiest market to find players in is strikers. There has never been a shortage of good strikers in recent history. And alot of them go for cheap before they become big Losing out on Huntelaar is not big deal since there will always be other good ones that will pop up. On the other hand, the number of good CBs and fullbacks is very rare. Hence why I would rather not splash heavy money on a sub striker when there are rare gems like Zapata waiting around
We'll be in Europe and play every 3 days, he'll get his chance and try to prove he can play more.

Zamparini wants players. Nocerino and Palladino said no so who do you think Palermo will want? Molinaro? He'll want Marchisio/Giovinco so do you make the deal? I certainly don't.

I agree that it's easier to find good strikers but I don't see younger talents who could score that many goals on a constant basis so I'd pay 20m to get him before he goes to another clubs and be worth 35-40m later.
 

Luca

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2007
12,750
Pay attention:

Del Piero is not bigger than Juventus. Juve always comes first. It's very simple, if Amauri or any of our forwards is playing better than Trez or Ale then that forward should should start. No 2 ways about it. No one is his right mind can deny Ale's infleunce on Juve. But at the end of the day, if someone is playing better, then I expect that payer to start.

And the reason all the fans were annoyed when Ibra started was because he was playing like crap while DP was on fire. That is all.
yes those point are fine, but don't speak to me like i'm an idiot, OK?
But who is to deny ale with the form he is in, he's played well through thick and thin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 17)