Amauri Carvalho de Oliveira (38 Viewers)

At what cost would you be ok with Amauri?

  • Giovinco + cash

  • De Ceglie + Criscito + cash

  • De Ceglie + Criscito + Giovinco

  • Nocerino + Almiron + Marchionni

  • Almiron + Marchionni + cash

  • Fuck no, don't want him at all

  • Almiron+cash


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,627
Amauri is great and I would take him on my team any day but if they really want him then it's to play with Trez. What about Iaquinta? He's been decisive for us this year most of the time. He can score and assist too. Amauri is a better player but would he be much better than Iaquinta in terms of goals and assists? I don't think so.

You all know what I think about Barzagli.


If we buy a striker then for me he must be much younger than Trez and should replace him in the future as a starting center forward. My pick is Huntelaar but players like Gomez, Benzema(plays more on the wing like Amauri but can be the loan striker) would be very good choices too.
 
OP
Dominic

Dominic

Senior Member
Jan 30, 2004
16,706
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #185
    I love Amauri as a player, but I have to agree with your rationale Mark. Someone who could accept the bench for now(that would mean no Huntelaar though) and who'd replace Trez in the future would be better.

    On the other hand, with a lot of competitions next season, with DP and Trez being injury-prone(not this season surprisingly, i'll knock on some wood) and Iaquinta also having missed some games through not being fit and if we want to be able to compete with Inter's deep squad; Amauri might be a prudent signing after all.

    I'm split on the Amauri issue.
     

    Bozi

    The Bozman
    Administrator
    Oct 18, 2005
    22,747
    Amauri is great and I would take him on my team any day but if they really want him then it's to play with Trez. What about Iaquinta? He's been decisive for us this year most of the time. He can score and assist too. Amauri is a better player but would he be much better than Iaquinta in terms of goals and assists? I don't think so.

    You all know what I think about Barzagli.


    If we buy a striker then for me he must be much younger than Trez and should replace him in the future as a starting center forward. My pick is Huntelaar but players like Gomez, Benzema(plays more on the wing like Amauri but can be the loan striker) would be very good choices too.
    i get you ther emark and your logic is sound, though i honestly think that we ahve been linked with barzagli for so long that this is a given. amauri?i recken we will go for him, though only if we lose out on huuntelar
     

    Mark

    The Informer
    Administrator
    Dec 19, 2003
    97,627
    I love Amauri as a player, but I have to agree with your rationale Mark. Someone who could accept the bench for now(that would mean no Huntelaar though) and who'd replace Trez in the future would be better.

    On the other hand, with a lot of competitions next season, with DP and Trez being injury-prone(not this season surprisingly, i'll knock on some wood) and Iaquinta also having missed some games through not being fit and if we want to be able to compete with Inter's deep squad; Amauri might be a prudent signing after all.

    I'm split between two opinions on Amauri.
    going from the Dutch league to Juve and play the Coppa and 10 games or more in Serie A the 1st year would be a small price to pay for The Hunter IMO. Later he'd get more games in A and the CL.
     

    Mark

    The Informer
    Administrator
    Dec 19, 2003
    97,627
    i get you ther emark and your logic is sound, though i honestly think that we ahve been linked with barzagli for so long that this is a given. amauri?i recken we will go for him, though only if we lose out on huuntelar
    Huntellar's agent in Italy(Morabito) said we have Amauri ahead over The Hunter on our list which I don't find logical but they are the guys in charge so...
     
    OP
    Dominic

    Dominic

    Senior Member
    Jan 30, 2004
    16,706
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #190
    That would make for one unhappy and unsettled Hunter, I reckon. If he comes, he'll expect to play, and for the price we'd have to pay for him, i'd want him to play.
     

    Mark

    The Informer
    Administrator
    Dec 19, 2003
    97,627
    That's for him and the club to decide before the transfer. They need to be straight up with him with the plans they have.
     

    Mark

    The Informer
    Administrator
    Dec 19, 2003
    97,627
    That's the problems they have to deal with every day. Getting Amauri also would unsettle Iaquinta, DP...

    If Huntelaar doesn't accept to play less games the 1st year or 2 then screw him. I don't think he will. Money rules then pay him good and he'll shut up for a while.

    :xfinger:
     

    Alen

    Ѕenior Аdmin
    Apr 2, 2007
    53,925
    I'm split on the Amauri issue.
    I'm not. I want him in Juve !

    As for Barzagli , some guys say he sucks in Palermo ( and he's really awful in every second match, being owned regularly) only because he doesn't have a senior world class defender aside him, while he's good in Italy because he has such player there(Cannavaro)
    This is BS, but even if it's true, may i ask who is the experienced WC player in Juve's defense who'll magically make Barzagli become a world class in Juve ?
    Barzagli will play great in Juve because he'll have the experienced Chiellini or because he'll have the world class Boumsong and Legrottaglie to play defense together with him ?
     

    Enoran

    Senior Member
    Nov 3, 2007
    1,739
    Like the idea of seeing Amauri in Juve ....

    He's got a tremendous leap when connecting with crosses, have decent pace and footwork. (after all, he is a Brazilian)

    Though he is no Trezequet in terms of finishing, he is gonna be a decent addition.

    Del Piero, Iaquinta, Amauri, Trezequet and Palladino, thats a handful for our opponents as well as for Ranieri. :)
    We will get to play 4-3-3 very often.

    Barzagli, not so sure of him ... he dun look so mobile. :eyebrows:
    We have Chiellini anyway, we need a World-Class LB ... thats for sure
     

    Gazzo

    Senior Member
    Jul 9, 2007
    1,745
    I'm not. I want him in Juve !

    As for Barzagli , some guys say he sucks in Palermo ( and he's really awful in every second match, being owned regularly) only because he doesn't have a senior world class defender aside him, while he's good in Italy because he has such player there(Cannavaro)
    This is BS, but even if it's true, may i ask who is the experienced WC player in Juve's defense who'll magically make Barzagli become a world class in Juve ?
    Barzagli will play great in Juve because he'll have the experienced Chiellini or because he'll have the world class Boumsong and Legrottaglie to play defense together with him ?
    What are you trying to get at lol are you for/against his transfer??

    I'd really only want Amauri if Palla were to go
     

    Alen

    Ѕenior Аdmin
    Apr 2, 2007
    53,925
    he is against the Barzagli transfer.
    It's not that i'd hate it if we sign Barzagli, but i don't see him as an improvement in our defense.

    If Barzagli was a great defender, a world class, he would have been head and sholders above everyone in Palermo. He would have been the one to organize and command their defense and he would have done it very well. But look at Palermo and their defense, watch Barzagli and notice how lost he looks sometimes.
    Materazzi was such leader in Peruggia, even Legro was a leader in Chievo. Barzagli is not even close to this. He's not doing good in Palermo, how can we let him lead our defense then ?

    People see him in the NT, people want an Italian defender and they're closing their eyes in front of the reality.
    And the reality is that apart from Chiellini there isn't a single world class Italian defender younger than 30 and that apart from Materazzi, Nesta and Cannavaro Italians didn't have a single world class CB in 2006 and only that's the reason why Barzagli found himself with the azzuri.
    Casiraghi talked about this problem few days ago. He praised Juve and Fiorentina for giving chances to the youngsters but he also said that he's having huge problems forming the defense for the u21 and how the problem lies in Italian football clubs that never give chances to the young Italian defenders and they go for foreigners instead. That's why there wasn't a single great Italian central defender between Nesta (generation 1976) and Chiellini (generation 1984), who still isn't great but is developing pretty well.

    I don't want Juve to pick players only based on their nationality. There are a lot of central defenders who will surely be an improvement over Legrottaglie. Barzagli is not much, if any at all, better than Legro.
     

    GordoDeCentral

    Diez
    Moderator
    Apr 14, 2005
    70,797
    I love Amauri as a player, but I have to agree with your rationale Mark. Someone who could accept the bench for now(that would mean no Huntelaar though) and who'd replace Trez in the future would be better.

    On the other hand, with a lot of competitions next season, with DP and Trez being injury-prone(not this season surprisingly, i'll knock on some wood) and Iaquinta also having missed some games through not being fit and if we want to be able to compete with Inter's deep squad; Amauri might be a prudent signing after all.

    I'm split on the Amauri issue.

    benzema would fit better with whats aboce
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 37)