C’mon dude. That’s not true at all. Tons of strikers score more at smaller clubs where they are the focal point of an attack and then flop at big clubs where they aren’t and have to work with other top attackers. Like Dybala and Morata having to tailor their games to suit Ronaldo here.
Also, Napoli has almost always played more attacking, higher scoring footie than Juve. Milik just isn’t very good. He doesn’t offer anything aside from his goals and he’s never been prolific like say Icardi of years ago.
Also, Napoli has almost always played more attacking, higher scoring footie than Juve. Milik just isn’t very good. He doesn’t offer anything aside from his goals and he’s never been prolific like say Icardi of years ago.
I do think Morata is very useful in our current squad, and logically looking, at least in my opinion, of all our striker options I'd sell Dybala (like I said 100 times). Not Morata.
However that doesn't mean I'm too happy about him being a starter here. In a perfect world I'd like to have him as a backup, despite his numbers this season. But I believe he's too expensive to be that since we're giving 10mln total for his wages. Milik would be a good option to have for our bench.
Also, not so long ago you were saying how Morata is better striker than Icardi because he scored more goals in the last three years. When you look how much he played in Paris, you'd see that goals per minute is better than Morata, even in his bad years in Paris. What he did at Inter was crazy. I understand when somebody says he's an asshole or that he doesn't suit Ronaldo, but saying that Morata is better is pure bullshit.
But yes, I'm not suggesting this season has turned into shit because of Morata. That's nonsense. I, like I mentioned before, was surprised to that rumour.
