Alvaro Morata (47 Viewers)

[U Picciriddu]

50m is a steal at this rate.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Stevie]

lmao, he scored 10 goals in last 5 games and only 4 of those counted. That some surreal bullshit, most of these disallowed goals were milimeters and caused by a stupid rules, else we would be talking about the most inform striker in Europe, bar Lewandowski maybe.

The rule is bullshit. Benefit should always be given to the striker this rule is ruining the game. Unless there is is day light between the forward and defender I think it should be on side.

Like if any part of the purge body is in line with a defender it's on side not the other way round

 

[DAiDEViL]

The rule is bullshit. Benefit should always be given to the striker this rule is ruining the game. Unless there is is delayed between the forward and fender I think it should be on side.

But that simply can't be with VAR. It's either offside or it isn't. And let's not pretend tuz wouldn't complain if we concede a goal from a slight offside position if it could have been easily ruled out by VAR.

 

[swag]

50m is a steal at this rate.

Given what we paid for Piguain? Yup

 

[LiquidPLP]

50m is a steal at this rate.

I'd say calma, rough patches will come for sure.

 

[Akshen]

But that simply can't be with VAR. It's either offside or it isn't. And let's not pretend tuz wouldn't complain if we concede a goal from a slight offside position if it could have been easily ruled out by VAR.

well this should be calculated somehow, because this for example:

how the hell can you call this offside?his whole body is on sideand this is something that should count, not part of his leg

 

[DAiDEViL]

well this should be calculated somehow, because this for example:

how the hell can you call this offside?

Because it is? Bad luck, but offside. Don't know what's controversial about it.

 

[Ali]

well this should be calculated somehow, because this for example:

how the hell can you call this offside?his whole body is on sideand this is something that should count, not part of his leg

Also the ball has already left Cuadrado's foot.

 

[DAiDEViL]

Focus on Kung Fu Cuads instead

 

[Elvin]

Very unlucky thus far and yet still showing very promising signs, looks like a completely different player compared to the last time he was here, much more mature and stronger when it comes to remaining on his feet, positioning and timing wise still needs to be worked on though.

He has been absolutely perfect so far.

 

[Stevie]

Because it is? Bad luck, but offside. Don't know what's controversial about it.

I know they were offside going by the current rules what we are saying is that the rule needs to be changed

 

[Akshen]

the problem is by definition of an offside rule attacker is gaining advantage by his position, which he is not in this case. How does the position of his feet matter when he actually has to go back to collect the ball.
Also this is not accurate checking how do they know when Cuads actually passed the ball, if they want to be so accurate then they have to know exact milisecond of this, calculating it according to the picture is bullshit.
I dont know how it should be done, but for me, things like this are ruining the game, just like cancelling a goal because there was a foul 1 minute before it in the build up. totalbullshit.

 

[JuveJay]

I agree with the sentiment, and obviously don't like it, but what DD says is true, it's a clinical and factual rule brought in and backed up by technology. So if they want to disregard some common sense and the benefit to attacking play for the sake of centimetres on body parts and rule like that then it becomes the same frustration for everyone.

 

[Amer]

Il nuovo Trezeguet.

 

[pavluska]

Some of you almost sound like anti Juventini complaining about technology backed offside calls.

While there have been actual crap ref calls in our games including pk's not given, a red, and fouls not being called fouls.

 

[CrimsonianKing]

Because it is? Bad luck, but offside. Don't know what's controversial about it.

There’s nothing controversial about it. People just want to keep making silly complaints.

 

[jukazem]

I know they were offside going by the current rules what we are saying is that the rule needs to be changed

Changed to what? Exclude trailing body parts, torso comparison only? I am not sure what people have it mind when they say change, so I am okay with what it is right now.

 

[U Picciriddu]

I'd say calma, rough patches will come for sure.

Of course. But this is definitely above expectations.

 

[Arcticdaly]

He has been brilliant but this offside stuff is nothing new for morata he was a offside machine at chelsea too he cant be just unlucky all the time.

 

[icemaη]

But that simply can't be with VAR. It's either offside or it isn't. And let's not pretend tuz wouldn't complain if we concede a goal from a slight offside position if it could have been easily ruled out by VAR.

I'm not entirely convinced that VAR will get it 100% right, because the technology still requires the decision of when the ball was played to be made. It's impossible (with current set up at least) to be completely sure of when the ball leaves the feet of the passer. Because there is going to be that margin of error and when the difference is only a few millimetres, there should be a way to account for that error.
Cricket (which has been embracing technology for decades) gets this right IMO by deciding that if the call is within the margin of error, then the on field umpires' call takes precedence. The other day I saw Mane get called offside (vs Everton I think it was) and the blue and red lines were basically on top of each other.