Look Bianconero_Aus I hope you don't take it personally, but I get very annoyed at someone arguing something they didn't even read correctly. If you can't see past it I'll put you on my ignore list it's not worth my time to argue for practically no reason.
Disagree prime Iaquinta and especially prime Toni were much better. In a class of their own compared to Matri. Matri's better now, but the talent just isn't there. It pains me he is our "best" attacker.
But they aren't prime now and Matri's goals ratio at Juve is better than theirs, so it's a pretty open and shut case in terms of comparing them as centre forwards.
Matri - 31/15 (31/15) 0.48 gpg
Iaquinta - 86/30 (107/40) 0.35 gpg
Toni - 14/2 (15/2) 0.14 gpg
But they aren't prime now and Matri's goals ratio at Juve is better than theirs, so it's a pretty open and shut case in terms of comparing them as centre forwards.
Matri - 31/15 (31/15) 0.48 gpg
Iaquinta - 86/30 (107/40) 0.35 gpg
Toni - 14/2 (15/2) 0.14 gpg
He had the same problems in the Catania game iirc. Got very little service in that game though he didn't have those those bad passes as in the udinese game and they are a clear indicator of a lack of concentration, confidence or whatever. Hasn't looked his usual self since the Cesena game.
He isn't going to react until one of Mirko is next to him or Quag starting in Pepe/Esti's place.
He isn't going to score many unless the service/movement in the front and around him changes.
People complained about Amauri ( ) not getting the proper service, the thing with Matri is he still scores and can score MUCH more if we have the right combination for him up front.