Before Islam, during Mohammad, after Mohammad, until today, you can see a pattern in the behavior of the nobility when put in the same position as Abu Sufyan. I can't help you people if you think that your shit doesn't smell as bad as my shit or any other's shit.
When you were on top and you had great privileges, you'll do whatever needed to keep these privileges. Just because Muslims think that everyone joined them because they realized that there is one true God and one true religion, doesn't mean it happened.
And yes, many normal people did join them for that. Islam was progressive and prosperous at the time and the place. No wonder many found it attractive. But from 7th till mid 15th century I have many examples (with various sources from different provenience) that show why did the nobility accept Islam or, if didn't convert to Islam, fought in Islamic armies, which makes me think that it was no different during Mohammad's time.
Live with it.
Btw, are you Moroccan?
P.S: And if we want a different source, can we check what do the Shia Muslims say about Abu Sufyan and his reasons why he converted to Islam?
Here it is:
"The Shia divide the companions into three factions: First, are those who
believed in Allah (SWT), believed in the Prophet (PBUH&HF), and gave all
they could for the sake of Islam. These are the highest in rank. These
companions ALWAYS supported the Prophet and were WITH him. They never
disobeyed him in every other issue, nor did they ever accused him of
talking non-sense! (may Allah protect us). Examples include, but are not
limited to, Ali Ibn Abi Talib (AS), Abu Dhar al-Ghifari, Salman al-Farsi,
Miqdad, Amar Ibn Yasir, Jabir Ibn Abdillah al-Ansari, ... may Allah (SWT)
be pleased with them.
The second group, are those who were Muslims, but were not sincere in
their acts.
The third group, are those who became apostate after the death of Prophet
as al-Bukhari recorded (see below), or those who neither believed in Allah
(SWT), nor the Prophet (PBUH&HF) in the first place, but managed to
infiltrate the Islamic isles to be included among the Muslims. These are
the hypocrites, like Abu Sufyan, his son Muawiyah, and his grandson Yazid.
Yazid, when he became caliph, said:
"Hashimite played with the throne, but no revelation was revealed, nor
was there a true message!!!""
http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/shia4.txt
When you were on top and you had great privileges, you'll do whatever needed to keep these privileges. Just because Muslims think that everyone joined them because they realized that there is one true God and one true religion, doesn't mean it happened.
And yes, many normal people did join them for that. Islam was progressive and prosperous at the time and the place. No wonder many found it attractive. But from 7th till mid 15th century I have many examples (with various sources from different provenience) that show why did the nobility accept Islam or, if didn't convert to Islam, fought in Islamic armies, which makes me think that it was no different during Mohammad's time.
Live with it.
Btw, are you Moroccan?
P.S: And if we want a different source, can we check what do the Shia Muslims say about Abu Sufyan and his reasons why he converted to Islam?
Here it is:
"The Shia divide the companions into three factions: First, are those who
believed in Allah (SWT), believed in the Prophet (PBUH&HF), and gave all
they could for the sake of Islam. These are the highest in rank. These
companions ALWAYS supported the Prophet and were WITH him. They never
disobeyed him in every other issue, nor did they ever accused him of
talking non-sense! (may Allah protect us). Examples include, but are not
limited to, Ali Ibn Abi Talib (AS), Abu Dhar al-Ghifari, Salman al-Farsi,
Miqdad, Amar Ibn Yasir, Jabir Ibn Abdillah al-Ansari, ... may Allah (SWT)
be pleased with them.
The second group, are those who were Muslims, but were not sincere in
their acts.
The third group, are those who became apostate after the death of Prophet
as al-Bukhari recorded (see below), or those who neither believed in Allah
(SWT), nor the Prophet (PBUH&HF) in the first place, but managed to
infiltrate the Islamic isles to be included among the Muslims. These are
the hypocrites, like Abu Sufyan, his son Muawiyah, and his grandson Yazid.
Yazid, when he became caliph, said:
"Hashimite played with the throne, but no revelation was revealed, nor
was there a true message!!!""
http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/shia4.txt
first and foremost dont call me you people, i never said i was a muslim/jew/hindu. Instead of all this speculation i asked you a simple question. sure its answer wont be in wikipedia, but it's still a simple question in what state did he die? let's simply look at the few fact we know, mmh say like historians would.
See Alen, thats where you cant fool me, you, at your own personal convenience and preference, choose the scientific method when it suits you yet very nimbly switch to the same hearsay you accuse your antagonists of. We both know you know nothing of the subject, i wonder why you keep on arguing, convenient ignorance maybe or is it mental masturbation?
As for where i am from? if it is any help for you to actually answer the questions i ask you then i ll be glad to fax you a copy of my passport.
