X Mas is arrived at Lovtuz part 3 (22 Viewers)
- Thread starter Bezzy
- Start date
Meaning before the deadline the BG chooses who to protect...at this point no one knows who that person is. It's not until (and IF) the G's try to whack that person that the narrator reveals who that person was. At least that's how we've been doing it.
------------
ex: The G's staged a drive-by and tried to whack Alen but just as they rolled up on him a car cut them off and swooped Alen into safety. The BG protected Alen.
Something like that ^ Where the BG's identity is not revealed but the whacking target is revealed + that he was protected.
------------
ex: The G's staged a drive-by and tried to whack Alen but just as they rolled up on him a car cut them off and swooped Alen into safety. The BG protected Alen.
Something like that ^ Where the BG's identity is not revealed but the whacking target is revealed + that he was protected.
I don't think we should be informed about the one BG has protected, rules seem clear to me, it was our bad in the previous games as Aaron said.
The fact that the BG knows it will be enough for us. If he/she protected him/herself last night, it means that the gangsters know who the BG is, so the BG should tell us publicly about his/her role as there is no point in hiding that anymore. But if the BG protected someone else last night, he/she should keep on keeping his/her role to him/herself (damn these all his' and hers'
)
Osman, you said last night that you checked your sent items and you noticed you'd sent the pm to Sabet instead of SABSAB, right?
The fact that the BG knows it will be enough for us. If he/she protected him/herself last night, it means that the gangsters know who the BG is, so the BG should tell us publicly about his/her role as there is no point in hiding that anymore. But if the BG protected someone else last night, he/she should keep on keeping his/her role to him/herself (damn these all his' and hers'
)Osman, you said last night that you checked your sent items and you noticed you'd sent the pm to Sabet instead of SABSAB, right?
I just checked and there is a member named Sabet 
If there wasn't, Osman would be informed with "the following users were not found" notification so we would know that he was lying but to my surprise, there is a member registered in 2009 under the name of Sabet so Osman has indeed pulled a Janna
Sabet is very unlikely to be a G.
Aaron, Tahir, Osman and Klin. If I were the D I'd investigate one of these four. I can understand if the D would want to investigate me too.
If there wasn't, Osman would be informed with "the following users were not found" notification so we would know that he was lying but to my surprise, there is a member registered in 2009 under the name of Sabet so Osman has indeed pulled a Janna
Sabet is very unlikely to be a G.Aaron, Tahir, Osman and Klin. If I were the D I'd investigate one of these four. I can understand if the D would want to investigate me too.