World War III edges closer..... (2 Viewers)

OP
Vinman

Vinman

2013 Prediction Cup Champ
Jul 16, 2002
11,482
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #222
    and consider these facts about Iran and the monkey in charge there when it comes to starting a war when it becomes nuclear-capable:



    no doubt WW3 will have Russia and Iran on one side with the USA, Israel, Britain, and the rest of the sane world on the other side

    its only a matter of time......
    Understand one thing about Putin, he is former KGB, and there are no doubts that he would like things to be as they were 30 years ago in the Soviet Union.

    I predict that he will begin annexing the smaller countries that border Russia in the next few years
    hmm.... I guess this thread wasnt worthless afterall ;)
     
    OP
    Vinman

    Vinman

    2013 Prediction Cup Champ
    Jul 16, 2002
    11,482
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #223
    when did the US start to follow the Geneva conventions?
    yeah well, what's the difference? people are being detained and tortured in guantanamo and the US has invaded a sovereign state
    oh...so you've visited there lately, how was the trip ??

    how badly were they being tortured ? did you have to look away ??

    The Geneva Convention covers enemy soldiers, not terrorists

    and if a little water-boarding gets some info out of these guys as to their next attack on innocent civilains, then so be it....I'll turn the hose "on"
     

    Seven

    In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
    Jun 25, 2003
    39,331
    oh...so you've visited there lately, how was the trip ??

    how badly were they being tortured ? did you have to look away ??

    The Geneva Convention covers enemy soldiers, not terrorists

    and if a little water-boarding gets some info out of these guys as to their next attack on innocent civilains, then so be it....I'll turn the hose "on"
    Bush's statement about Russia's foreign policy was priceless though. God, that was funny.
     

    Enron

    Tickle Me
    Moderator
    Oct 11, 2005
    75,661
    I'm not looking forward to being Barbara Walters' slave boy. Though it's probably better than the alternative that Vinnie gets.... Oprah.
     

    Nenz

    Senior Member
    Apr 17, 2008
    10,472
    oh...so you've visited there lately, how was the trip ??

    how badly were they being tortured ? did you have to look away ??

    The Geneva Convention covers enemy soldiers, not terrorists

    and if a little water-boarding gets some info out of these guys as to their next attack on innocent civilains, then so be it....I'll turn the hose "on"
    bad. And it got very little information out of terrorists.

    Rebel, i don't think what the Americans are doing is much better. But what i'm trying to say is that disregarding an international governing body (that when countries do accord is successful) sets a precedent for the rest of the world! A very bad one!
    America do use illegal methods of interrogation(water boarding etc.) but there is no doubt its the lesser of two evils. I would rather some "freedom fighters" feel uncomfortable than what is going on in Georgia right now or what went on post WWII.
    And also compare Georgia to Iraq... in Georgia where was the oppressive dicator? Did Georgia gas thousands of innocent people? If the US's reason for invading was false, then at least I'm glad they had achieved something. Russia on the other hand can only do harm to what was a well working country, and the only thing they will achieve is oppression, rather than liberation.
     
    Jan 7, 2004
    29,704
    oh...so you've visited there lately, how was the trip ??

    how badly were they being tortured ? did you have to look away ??

    The Geneva Convention covers enemy soldiers, not terrorists

    and if a little water-boarding gets some info out of these guys as to their next attack on innocent civilains, then so be it....I'll turn the hose "on"
    and pray tell, good sir, is not torture to be detained without being properly charged and trialled. fuck vinman, how can you proclaim to be part of this sane world when you are such a big hypocrite? how do you know the people you are detaining are not innocent civilians?

    how can you rise in the name of democracy and freedom when you go and do just the opposite. how can your administration try and push the ideas on a sovereign state when it finds justification for doing such on lies and deceit. lies to the same people that they were elected to serve, sending their children into a not only unnecessary but awfully planned war that has cost the lives of tens of thousands and trillions of dollars.

    and further more for that same commander-in-chief to go out and veto two bills that would guarantee healthcare to the poorest of the children and the best universities to those who had served in the military.
     
    Jan 7, 2004
    29,704
    bad. And it got very little information out of terrorists.

    Rebel, i don't think what the Americans are doing is much better. But what i'm trying to say is that disregarding an international governing body (that when countries do accord is successful) sets a precedent for the rest of the world! A very bad one!
    America do use illegal methods of interrogation(water boarding etc.) but there is no doubt its the lesser of two evils. I would rather some "freedom fighters" feel uncomfortable than what is going on in Georgia right now or what went on post WWII.
    And also compare Georgia to Iraq... in Georgia where was the oppressive dicator? Did Georgia gas thousands of innocent people? If the US's reason for invading was false, then at least I'm glad they had achieved something. Russia on the other hand can only do harm to what was a well working country, and the only thing they will achieve is oppression, rather than liberation.
    what are you talking about? you heard russia's president. the georgian government was attacking russian civilians and they had to intervene to protect them.
     

    Nenz

    Senior Member
    Apr 17, 2008
    10,472
    what are you talking about? you heard russia's president. the georgian government was attacking russian civilians and they had to intervene to protect them.
    you could say the same about 9/11. Although Russia was provoked i don't think its okay to go one worse. Super powers have to set the precedent for everyone else, that they can have military power but shouldn't abuse it. They probably could have protected their civilians without employing malisha to terrorise Georgian civilians. Fairly hypocritical i must say.
     

    Nenz

    Senior Member
    Apr 17, 2008
    10,472
    the differences are above...i cbf with a thesis right now :lol:

    but later, you watch out bes... i'm comin to getcha with nenzy's words of wisdom!!
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)