Wishlist and General Juve winter mercato talk (2013-14) (12 Viewers)

[Elvin]

It's soooo gonna be Menez. Beppe's all over that like flies on shiit.

@Azzurri7 likes this

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Suns]

So we're buying Nani and benching him? Or we're benching one of Asamoah, Barz, Bonucci or Chiellini to accommodate Nani in a 4-3-3? It will never happen. We'll end up getting Bonaventura anyway. He's cheap, from Atalanta(because we love our January signings from Bergamo) and he can participate in the CL.

 

[Furino]

Bonucci to Monaco... That would be a dream.. We could easy get at least 15M, and it would make it so much easier for Conto to change to a 4-man defence.. But it will never happen:-(

What the hell man? Is this 4-3-3 madness wash some of you brains out, that you think selling Bonucci to Monaco would be a dream?

 

[Nicholas]

Selling Bonucci

He's our future alone with Ogbonna.

 

[VuvuzelaBzz]

Padoin is not needed and Peluso became more absolete with Ogbonna signing.

DC is not going anywhere (if not simply for home grown quota), and Isla is trickier to offload with his co-own situation. He is a goner on the summer though.

I agree on Peluso, but not quite on Padoin. If Pado leaves and we don't sign anyone else for that right wingback spot we might end up seeing even more of Isla there if Licht were to get injured again. I know Caceres would be second choice, but he's been filling in as a CB for the most part recently due to injuries and whatnot, which plants the seed of doubt in my mind. As for DC, it'd be difficult to fill his spot with someone more useless, so we could just bring in a Primavera player like Beltrame, but alas, deep down I know we won't

Anyways, I don't see why we'd have to sell 2 players to fund a 3m move regardless. If I remember correctly we paid 5m for Peluso less than 6 months ago, so I would hope he'd fetch at least 3m if we were to sell currently.

 

[Zacheryah]

Bonucci to Monaco... That would be a dream.. We could easy get at least 15M, and it would make it so much easier for Conto to change to a 4-man defence.. But it will never happen:-(

Links to Menez and Nani again.. I guess both would be more or les ideal signings, when considering talent vs. price vs. how much we need wingers vs. our economic situation..

4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 is the way to go, if we are ever going to challenge in CL.. = more wingers, less CBs..

Yes, going 4man backline, means its great so sell one of the central defenders. Makes perfect sense..

Your argument about formations is bullshit. 4-3-3 is popular cause fagcelona uses it.

However, 4321 or 4312 are perfectly fine if you got the players, and apart from the CAM we got exactly the players. It would ideally suit our 3man midfield post pirlo.

 

[Klin]

However, 4321 or 4312 are perfectly fine if you got the players, and apart from the CAM we got exactly the players. It would ideally suit our 3man midfield post pirlo.

Is that a new obsession of yours?

Who would you put at LB?

 

[AngrySerb]

Kolarov, Menez, Nani. 4-3-3 no problem

 

[rakib567]

if we want to go for 4-3-3 i would like 1 world class winger and 2 very good wingers.

 

[Badass J Elkann]

"Between Peluso, Padoin, Isla and De Ceglie, two might leave in January to finance the purchase of Menez. Marotta won't offer more than 3m for the Frenchman." - GDS

we can't sell DC because of the home grown rule, Peluso has been linked with lazio.

 

[Zacheryah]

Is that a new obsession of yours?

Who would you put at LB?

Asamoah or chiellini. Or ogbonna.

They did just fine against real

 

[Klin]

Asamoah or chiellini. Or ogbonna.

They did just fine against real

Asamoah did fine because his job was mainly to defend. Against weaker teams when he's expected to help us offensively, it'll be a different story.

 

[Nzoric]

Asamoah did fine because his job was mainly to defend. Against weaker teams when he's expected to help us offensively, it'll be a different story.

Our fullbacks were incredibly offensive in the Madrid games, because both wingers sought space in the middle.

It's just easier for a fullback to get forward as he usually receives the ball in open space, much more time to cross or just run at goal instead of receiving the ball with a defender on him, as he does when he plays at WB.

 

[JCK]

Our fullbacks were incredibly offensive in the Madrid games, because both wingers sought space in the middle.

It's just easier for a fullback to get forward as he usually receives the ball in open space, much more time to cross or just run at goal instead of receiving the ball with a defender on him, as he does when he plays at WB.

Against Madrid in both features we played in total around 35 minutes. Those two matches are not a reference.

 

[Nzoric]

Against Madrid in both features we played in total around 35 minutes. Those two matches are not a reference.

I used them as a reference for how he played against big teams, thats what Klin was posting about.

 

[Klin]

Our fullbacks were incredibly offensive in the Madrid games, because both wingers sought space in the middle.

It's just easier for a fullback to get forward as he usually receives the ball in open space, much more time to cross or just run at goal instead of receiving the ball with a defender on him, as he does when he plays at WB.

You are correct. What I was trying to say is that he'll still be a liability offensively, and we'd need his width in such a narrow formation.

 

[JCK]

I used them as a reference for how he played against big teams, thats what Klin was posting about.

He didn't play, that's what I was telling you.

 

[Nzoric]

He didn't play, that's what I was telling you.

Yes he did and you are so far off with the 35min bullshit. We were superb in the majority of both games, except for a few blunders.

 

[Mark]

:burke:

 

[Nzoric]

Hey Mark, did you catch the game yesterday.

Pwned.