Nop, i'll tell you why.
Llorente is by far the best finisher if he comes. He's understudy is matri, who can play a simular role, less good, less clinical. Matri-vucinic would be a real drop in scoring.
So if we got a scoring ss, that doesnt need vucinic creativity, he can pair matri if llorente cannot play
Like this, we got a good striker, a weak backup, a creative ss, and a scoring ss.
- - - Updated - - -
@Zacheryah;
I really wanted to ask you, seeing how you are an expert in juve mercato budget and in our finances, how much did Marotta offer to ATM when we were after Aguero, and how much did he offer to the player seing he was already on a 5mil/year wages IIRC. ???
I'm not an expert at all, i just take note of the actual offers and our finances. Wel finances, i mean i read the annual rapports, and what people report in the excellent "financial situation thread"
On to your question.
Aguero, is not a Llorente.
Wow, quite obvious, isnt it ? but i mean financially. Aguero would bring an enormous commerial windfall, having many fans and an argentine fanbase. he's an allrounded fuoriclasse, fans would massively get his shirt, he'd be "THE" new creative player in the line of boniperti, platini, baggio, del piero.
Because of this, more millions can be spend on aguero, because he'll make those back trough merchandising.
I think, we offered 25 mil + performance related bonuses wich would see it rise to 28 mil. And a contract that would be between 5 and 6 mil. wich is really the maximum we can do for any player.