Wishlist and General Juve mercato talk (2012-13) (46 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
AOD4

AOD4

Senior Member
#2,842
Nov 24, 2004
3,861
#2,842
CM, RW/RB/RWB checked.

So LB/LWB,CB,CF,RW/SS - another 4 more signings.

The most interesting would be LB/LWB as there hasn't been much options on that position.
 
Gerd

Gerd

Senior Member
#2,846
Dec 25, 2011
5,955
#2,846
Zlatan said:
I dont get this deal with the co-ownership? I understand the benefit of loan + option to buy, we get another yearly installement, but whats the deal with the co-ownership of Asamoah and Isla? Because I sincerely doubt we'd let them go back to Udine.
Click to expand...
Point is that you split the amount of money and have more money to spend in this transfer window
Let's say you have 40 mil to spend this year and expect to have 40 mil the next year . If you buy them you spend 30 mil and 10 mil are left to buy all the players you need this transfer window , if you co-own them you spend 15 mil and 25 mil are left . You pay half of them at a later date so you have money at this moment to make other purchases .
It is a nice way to buy all the players that you would have bought in 2 transfer seasons in 1 .
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
#2,855
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
#2,855
Rollie said:
Boys, everything I've seen just basically reiterates that it's about 30M for the pair, split into two payments. Udinese gets two healthy chunks, and has some purchasing power right away. Well see, but any of the terminology is going to be primarily for accounting purposes... wouldn't pay much attention to that co-own talk.

There's not going to be a negotiation for their 'other half' of these players, these are 2 of Udinese's top 3 players - and the two most desirable players from Serie A's 3rd place team. These fees are negotiated already, no doubt.
Click to expand...


I agree, this is not a co-ownership at all, thats why I'm asking about the benefit for either us or udinese instead of a straight purchase or loan+option to buy.
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
#2,857
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
#2,857
Gerd said:
Point is that you split the amount of money and have more money to spend in this transfer window
Let's say you have 40 mil to spend this year and expect to have 40 mil the next year . If you buy them you spend 30 mil and 10 mil are left to buy all the players you need this transfer window , if you co-own them you spend 15 mil and 25 mil are left . You pay half of them at a later date so you have money at this moment to make other purchases .
It is a nice way to buy all the players that you would have bought in 2 transfer seasons in 1 .
Click to expand...

That doesnt make much sense, we never pay everything at once anyways, all the transfers are done in installements, take a look at all our transfers in the last ten years and you'll see that they are all done over 3 years.


The point of the loan+option is that it gave you another yearly installement, so you could do it over 4 years instead of 3. So what is the deal with co-ownership? Does it give you an extra year, like 3 for the first part + 3 foor the second, or what? BEcause if its only two installements, thats less than we usualy do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 44)