Wishlist and General Juve mercato talk (2011-12) (27 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
With all the talk of who they are going to buy in the summer, the fact that this team has dropped 8 attainable points with those 4 draws at home are very disconcerning. They are pissing away a golden opportunity to at least clinch a CL spot by mid April if this keeps up.
if udinese keeps this up theyll be relegated

bad periods happen, yet we still are in first place with a game spare

this is serie a, its balanced, its hard, crapteams can actually defend and are adept at parking the buss

its not la fucking liga were at the kickoff the asses get handed over to the superior team.

Welcome to Serie A

There is no common sense in discrediting Giovinco anymore.

And with Giovinco here doesn't mean that Vucinic should be on the bench of vice versa. Vucinic is comfortable enough to play on the right.

Giovinco - Rossi - Vucinic

I think that would be great. All of them can score, all of them can create and all of them can play in all the spots. Great versatility and good quality. Also its realistic and wouldn't cost us too much. 8-9 million for Giovinco's half and 20 million for Rossi.
absolutely not true

Having pirlo, rossi and giovinco in the same team, will destroy our way of play. we will be unable to pressure the other team, and get pressed against our own goal the entire time.

giovinco is a good player when counterattacking, or when playing with a very strong midfield, like the azurri has with marchisio-de rossi-montolivo, in a 2 striker systhem


we need vucinic, a replacement for pepe that is adept at pressing, and maybe a more profilic goalscorer for matri, altho i think with the right players around him, he'd be doing exponentionally better
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Gerd

Senior Member
Dec 25, 2011
5,955
ok i understand , but he is still not a game changer in my opinion
the game changer is the one who takes the match in his hand , trezeguet didn't do that
not saying that trezeguet was not crucial and decisive , he always was

I'm sure Ribery could play on right or Mirko could move to the right. There's no point discussing this anyway since neither Ribery or Robben will come to Juve.
not saying he can't , but i like wingers to be inverted so the can cut to center
 
May 22, 2007
37,256
ok i understand , but he is still not a game changer in my opinion
the game changer is the one who takes the match in his hand , trezeguet didn't do that
not saying that trezeguet was not crucial and decisive , he always was
I always thought a game changer is someone that can change the entire game in a single moment using their ability as a footballer.
 

Fr3sh

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2011
37,253
Buffon
Licht-Barzagli-Chiellini-Cissokho
Vidal-Pirlo-Marchisio
Ramirez-Matri-Jovetic​

To appease Gramps (Sergio), let's get a young striker like Desto...one for the future and perhaps we might not need to spend millions on a Benz or Higuain.
Yea I like this set-up a lot! A few tweaks away from making an epic comeback in Europe. I'd also like to see more of our youth players being integrated...A decent amount of them are being praised a lot (Immobile, Appelt, The black kid forgot his name, Giandonatto, Magnusson etc) since we (hopefully) will be in 3 tournaments I hope Copa would be used specifically for youth players and integrating them into our system.


Oh and Trezeguet is a game changer!! Take the Juve of old and replace Trez with Amauri and we'll probably get half the goals we had with Trezegol.
 

Gerd

Senior Member
Dec 25, 2011
5,955
I always thought a game changer is someone that can change the entire game in a single moment using their ability as a footballer.
we have different opinions
what i think it is that trezeguet without the team and someone to give him the ball he would never score and be a game changer , instead del piero could , he could have taken the ball and made a dribble and shot and score , or give the assist of the winning goal
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
we have different opinions
what i think it is that trezeguet without the team and someone to give him the ball he would never score and be a game changer , instead del piero could , he could have taken the ball and made a dribble and shot and score , or give the assist of the winning goal
Trezeguet would anticipate a ball in the box that no-one else would and would score.

Without that anticipation, it wouldn't have even occurred to people that the situation could be a chance.
 

Fr3sh

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2011
37,253
Trezeguet would anticipate a ball in the box that no-one else would and would score.

Without that anticipation, it wouldn't have even occurred to people that the situation could be a chance.
And he communicated with Del Piero through telepathy! Nigga was intense like that!
 
May 22, 2007
37,256
we have different opinions
what i think it is that trezeguet without the team and someone to give him the ball he would never score and be a game changer , instead del piero could , he could have taken the ball and made a dribble and shot and score , or give the assist of the winning goal


Without Trezeguet, players like Del Piero, Zambrotta, Nedved and Camoranesi wouldn't have found themselves creating so many goals. You're just describing the importance of each player in a team. Del Piero without Trezeguet would have about three bodies around him at all times.

Trezeguet would anticipate a ball in the box that no-one else would and would score.

Without that anticipation, it wouldn't have even occurred to people that the situation could be a chance.
To illustrate this point.

 

Gerd

Senior Member
Dec 25, 2011
5,955
Trezeguet would anticipate a ball in the box that no-one else would and would score.

Without that anticipation, it wouldn't have even occurred to people that the situation could be a chance.
it seems we have different opinions , for me trezeguet was decisive not a game changer
i consider game changers players like del piero , ibra , robben ect
 

AndreaCristiano

Nato, Vive, e muore Italiano
Jun 9, 2011
19,126
http://www.calciomercato.com/mercato/giovinco-gia-in-tasca-sacchi-consiglia-jovetic-alla-juve-593445

Interesting Sacchi speaks to Jovetic says go to JUVE

Without Trezeguet, players like Del Piero, Zambrotta, Nedved and Camoranesi wouldn't have found themselves creating so many goals. You're just describing the importance of each player in a team. Del Piero without Trezeguet would have about three bodies around him at all times.



To illustrate this point.

As much as we clash I am in total agreement here, the fact that people on here dont rate trez its a bit confusing
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
Obviously Del Piero was(is) a game changer, but so was Trezeguet in a completely different sense.

Their magic would often come out of no-where, and we just don't have that in this team right now and we need it in one fashion or another.

Forza Sacchi for telling us to sign Jovetic.

Hell yes, we should absolutely go for it.
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,086
if udinese keeps this up theyll be relegated

bad periods happen, yet we still are in first place with a game spare

this is serie a, its balanced, its hard, crapteams can actually defend and are adept at parking the buss

its not la fucking liga were at the kickoff the asses get handed over to the superior team.

Welcome to Serie A



absolutely not true

Having pirlo, rossi and giovinco in the same team, will destroy our way of play. we will be unable to pressure the other team, and get pressed against our own goal the entire time.

giovinco is a good player when counterattacking, or when playing with a very strong midfield, like the azurri has with marchisio-de rossi-montolivo, in a 2 striker systhem


we need vucinic, a replacement for pepe that is adept at pressing, and maybe a more profilic goalscorer for matri, altho i think with the right players around him, he'd be doing exponentionally better
That is stupid, the only difference is Giovinco. Vucinic will still be there while the difference between Matri and Rossi wouldn't be that big. And Giovinco is a good player, in both attacking and counter attacking. Stop making shit up. Back in the day people used to say that Giovinco is not good enough against teams that pressure us, now he's an expert against teams that pressure? Please.
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
Without Trezeguet, players like Del Piero, Zambrotta, Nedved and Camoranesi wouldn't have found themselves creating so many goals. You're just describing the importance of each player in a team. Del Piero without Trezeguet would have about three bodies around him at all times.



To illustrate this point.

Lots of examples.

This is the one I had in my head:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 24)