Am I the only guy here who isn't big on Eriksen? He was a top midfielder 2-3 years ago but seems to have really dropped of since then.
He's only 28, but an old 28. I don't see him rediscovering his best form.
We spent 35m over 5 years, that'd be 7m. I don't see a problem with that at all. I don't even expect Kulu to ever play for us, he will be exchanged for another player in summer.
We spent 35m over 5 years, that'd be 7m. I don't see a problem with that at all. I don't even expect Kulu to ever play for us, he will be exchanged for another player in summer.
that would be an odd move unless his value his appreciated highly by then in which case he is likely awesome and worth keeping. 40mil is a lot to spend on a 19 y/o you planning on immediately trading
that would be an odd move unless his value his appreciated highly by then in which case he is likely awesome and worth keeping. 40mil is a lot to spend on a 19 y/o you planning on immediately trading
We spent 35m over 5 years, that'd be 7m. I don't see a problem with that at all. I don't even expect Kulu to ever play for us, he will be exchanged for another player in summer.
No one's gonna pay 35 million for Kulusevski. It makes no sense to sell him in the summer.
Paratici loves plusvalenza but he isn't an idiot.
The only possibility of letting him go is as a sweetener while signing an expensive player like Pogba or Milinkovic Savic, but even that is highly unlikely.
How do you accommodate him with all the players that we already have? I guess he'd be played only as AM, where we have too many players now: Berna, Costa, Ramsey and now Kulusevski. We'd have to sell at least two of them, if not three...
We spent 35m over 5 years, that'd be 7m. I don't see a problem with that at all. I don't even expect Kulu to ever play for us, he will be exchanged for another player in summer.