All those insults where towards Tom for banning Burke and using double standards, while half of them were made by Burke as he was using my account. And please, those were attacks directed at Tom, and only Tom.
And nobody is answering my questions here...what I would like to know is why Tom would make such a comment like that...what would posess someone to make a statement such as that when it is clear as DAY people are very saddened by the Pope's health. The only answers I'm comming up with is the simple willingness to incite people during their time of sorrow.
Tell me this Tom/Paul...what if I were to make a comment in the London bombing thread, referring to the 50 or so who died "well, that's just 50 some other blokes"? Now, how would you feel if you had actually lost someone you loved in that attack? Would it be right for me to say those people are just some other blokes nobody really cares about? Huh? I don't think so Paul, and you know it.
However, you are a real advocatee of free speech Paul...like the time Mexicans at the Azteca cheered and praised Osama's name while playing the US...as I recall you had no problem with that and defended them...or same thing with the issue of people who have a problem with the Pope. So yes, you are indeed an advocate of free speech....oh wait, thats not exactly right. As I recall you went apeshit on Burke for making fun of the London bombing, and however wrong making fun of bombings may be you still could not stand it Paul, and demanded something be done about the poster who made the comments. See, free speech is alright until it offends you, Paul. And that is my point in all of this. I see comments like Tom's as nothing but attempts at pissing people off, being intolerable of other religions.
So Tom, please tell us why you made that comment in the Pope's thread.
And nobody is answering my questions here...what I would like to know is why Tom would make such a comment like that...what would posess someone to make a statement such as that when it is clear as DAY people are very saddened by the Pope's health. The only answers I'm comming up with is the simple willingness to incite people during their time of sorrow.
Tell me this Tom/Paul...what if I were to make a comment in the London bombing thread, referring to the 50 or so who died "well, that's just 50 some other blokes"? Now, how would you feel if you had actually lost someone you loved in that attack? Would it be right for me to say those people are just some other blokes nobody really cares about? Huh? I don't think so Paul, and you know it.
However, you are a real advocatee of free speech Paul...like the time Mexicans at the Azteca cheered and praised Osama's name while playing the US...as I recall you had no problem with that and defended them...or same thing with the issue of people who have a problem with the Pope. So yes, you are indeed an advocate of free speech....oh wait, thats not exactly right. As I recall you went apeshit on Burke for making fun of the London bombing, and however wrong making fun of bombings may be you still could not stand it Paul, and demanded something be done about the poster who made the comments. See, free speech is alright until it offends you, Paul. And that is my point in all of this. I see comments like Tom's as nothing but attempts at pissing people off, being intolerable of other religions.
So Tom, please tell us why you made that comment in the Pope's thread.
