I fundamentally disagree with Greg. In this situation, he thinks he's sticking it to TV viewers from around the globe at the expense of the integrity of the game and deserved teams hurt by poor calls. But the problem is, he's actually throwing the arm-chair pundits a bone by not correcting the poor calls made on the pitch, made for whatever reason. If you eliminate ridiculous calls and non-calls like this Henry debacle yesterday, you eliminate the leather lazy-boy folks who think they know better or believe they could do a better job than the people on the pitch. Correct the calls then and there, and you leave the leechfucks with nothing else to discuss.
But they aren't really leechfucks, though. Not everyone can attend a single match that is watched by millions around the globe, so this criticism of the television spectators isn't very fair.
But they aren't really leechfucks, though. Not everyone can attend a single match that is watched by millions around the globe, so this criticism of the television spectators isn't very fair.
But kowtowing to the leather La-Z-Boy folks isn't the answer.
We may as just rid the game of officials and have everyone with a TV remote vote on whether or not a ball was in play or not, offsides or not, a handball or not, etc. It will be like "Who Wants to Be A Millionaire?", except "phone a friend" will be for each coach on any contentious play. Everybody watching on TV gets empowered from their superior perspective of the game with a beer in hand and a bowl of nachos in their laps. Done, done, and done. The sport and everyone is a winner. Yay for football.
