Who created Hell? (20 Viewers)

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,254
#61
Come on Enron; forget your friends, the bible clearly idicates the existence of hell.

That's not up for discussion.:D


I will, however, give you the benefit of the doubt. Explain to me what you think my bible quotations mean.
Oh I think it might be up for discussion.;)
Hope you don't mind me reorganizing the quotes.:D
Here goes:

Jude 1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of ETERNAL FIRE.

-Dude are you kidding me? This doesn't refer to hell at all. In fact, it is a direct reference to the wrath of god, which in this case is brought from the heaven by angels, not from the depths of hell by devils. Stay out of the OT as much as you can with this subject. God does his own dirty work and hands out direct smiting.


"And if thy foot offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter halt into life, than having two feet to be cast into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched" (Mark 9:45)

- Doing bad things will lead to a bad end.

In a story Jesus tells, the man who is carried away into hell cries: ". . .I am tormented in this FLAME." Luke 16:24

- This is one is quite obvious.

Here is the entire quote:

"And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame." KJ

-It is obviously a cry for mercy to Jesus, by someone feeling bad about something they have done. In the King James version, hell is not mentioned.

Jesus says: "And shall cast them into a FURNACE OF FIRE: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth." Matthew 13:42

-Alone this seems as if it is a direct mention of hell, but when read in context to the previous and following paragraphs.

Mat 13:41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
Mat 13:42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Mat 13:43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.(KJ)

-It basically states that angels will come down and cleanse the earth of evil. Whether or not this is a direct reference to hell is up for debate.

Jesus says: "Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting EVERLASTING FIRE, prepared for the devil and his angels: . . ." [Note: hell was never originally prepared for people. However, because we have broken God's laws, God's justice now demands it.] Matthew 25:41

- The 25th chapter of Matthew is about helping those who need it. Helping someone who is sick, poor, or imprisoned. Again it doesn't directly call out hell, but it does hint at a punishment if one fails to lead the righteous life. Which would apparently be dealt out by angels and/or devils. Because of its placement in the context of the chapter it is difficult to say whether or not the everlasting fire is literal or a figurative shunning by society.

Jesus says in Matthew 5:22 "But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of HELL FIRE.

-This one is easy. I wrote a paper on this once. This part of Matthew reflects Jesus's teachings on anger. He basically says that being angry at someone without cause is just as bad as killing them. Its a teaching that anger leads down a bad road. Again, I don't think the mention of hell fire is to be take literal.


Jesus says in Matthew 18:8 Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast [them] from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into EVERLASTING FIRE.

-This is generally a warning of the danger of sin. Most importantly those of lust and as it is referred to earlier in the chapter, mocking the followers of Christ.


Revelation 20:15 says, " And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the LAKE OF FIRE.

- Basically says that everyone not "down" goes to hell. I'll concede this one, but I don't like to considering Revelation was written much later in history. The way I view Revelation is as a construct of man warning people to watch out for those who would manipulate them into following a "false" version of Christianity. To me it warns more of fundamentalism than it does the end of the world. But to each his own.


Revelation 14:10 says: "and he shall be tormented with FIRE and BRIMSTONE in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:"

- We should include the entire quote. When you pick and choose you aren't properly analyzing the context of the literature.

" The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:"(KJ)

-Again we get a reference to "fire and brimstone" which as we know generally comes from God. In addition, there is a mention of holy angels being present along with the Lamb of God (Jesus). Last time I checked Jesus and the angels were not the keepers of hell. Nor the proprietors of torment.


Revelation 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the LAKE which burneth with FIRE and BRMISTONE: which is the second death.

-Basically states that evil people and non-believer will be ressurected with everyone else but will end up in a burning lake which well end in there second death. It's very figurative. Hell is supposed to be a place of everlasting torment/punishment. This passage mentions a second death. In hell there is no death. The burning lake could represent many things, one of them being that the continuance of old habits will lead to death and the loss of a second chance.

A note on Revelation:
- The words Fire and Brimstone are used many times throughout the Bible, mostly in the NT and the Book of Revelation
- In some cases the f and b comes from the nostrils of horses, which is hardly the fire of hell.
- Revelation is very figurative book of the bible considering we "drink from a cup of indignation" and the many references to Jesus as the Lamb of God, the great city referring to women, and the waters referring to peoples the world.
- This use of figurative language suggests that revelation is not a literal piece, consistency of all things tells us that the Lake of Fire is not to be taken literally.
-When you think of f and b, they aren't used to preserve or punish but to destroy. An example is the story of Soddom and Gomorra.
- The point I am getting at is much of the Bible is written in a figurative tongue. Therefore it is not possible to take a "literal hell" away from it's reading without taking away other literal points, such as chopping one's foot off or tearing away your eyes when you have a dirty thought.

Hope this was helpful. Good luck reading.
-
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,254
#62
You're looking at it the wrong way.

Prisons are not just intended for those that break laws but they also serve deterrents for people to not commit crimes. Hell works the same way.

Btw, what does hell really mean for people here?
Me? Nothing. I don't live for the afterlife. I live for now. I do good things and I strive to help people because I believe it is the right thing to do and anything else is a waste.
 

Zé Tahir

JhoolayLaaaal!
Moderator
Dec 10, 2004
29,281
#63
Me? Nothing. I don't live for the afterlife. I live for now. I do good things and I strive to help people because I believe it is the right thing to do and anything else is a waste.
I meant...how do you interpret it to be.

My view is that there are two heavens & hells. There's a heaven and hell on earth; they are determined by the choices we make. If we choose to do bad deeds we live a life of hell while those that choose to do good deeds live a life of heaven. Similarly, after we die we are judged by our deeds.

I don't believe in a physical heaven nor a physical hell, nor do I believe that hell is eternal.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,254
#64
I meant...how do you interpret it to be.

My view is that there are two heavens & hells. There's a heaven and hell on earth; they are determined by the choices we make. If we choose to do bad deeds we live a life of hell while those that choose to do good deeds live a life of heaven. Similarly, after we die we are judged by our deeds.

I don't believe in a physical heaven nor a physical hell, nor do I believe that hell is eternal.
You have to realize I don't have a traditional belief system. Mine is very broad. I don't know if there is an afterlife (heaven or hell). And I don't really care. It's not something I worry about on a day to day basis. Religion is never a priority in anything I do, nor is it part of the criteria by which I judge someone.

I believe we are judged by mankind way before we even need to begin worrying about god. Therefore we should live our lives for the good of man, rather than for the good of God. That and the whole living a good life to avoid hell thing pisses me off, you should do that anyway.

If you want my exact opinion on whether there is hell or not. I would have to say that hell doesn't exist. From what I've read, God prefers to deal out punishments straight from his left hand. The Bible and similar writings are far too figurative to establish any concrete yes or not. As I said earlier, to each his own.
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
#65
Now religion suggests that life is a test, if you pass, you go to heaven, if you fail, you go to hell.

Jail and Hell are not evil, they are simply the negative destinies we achieve after faiiling the test.
Now, to conduct a successful test. all of the subject being tested should take the test under the same conditions, right? For example, in college, you'd be pretty pissed if other students had 60 minutes to do a test and you'd have only 25 to do the same test? That wouldn't be pretty fair, would it?

In the same manner, you cant expect people who live in incredibly different conditions to behave the same. It's not the same if a man steals so he can afford a new car or if he steals to buy food for his kids, etc, etc.

Also, isn't God supposed to be omnipotent? If so, than this test, life, free will is completely unnecessary, God should already know how we'll do the test. And, yes, I know, you'll mention free will and everything, but isn't the meaning of omnipotent that He "knows all, sees all, hears all"? If so, than regardless of our free will to make choices, He already knows what that choice will be or what our free will will be.


God isn't telling us " ok, live you're life, and when you are done, I will burn you in hell." He is giving us free will to decide for ourselves. He didn't make us into sheeps that will automatically obey him. We have the choice, it is in our hands, if we fail to comply, we face our destiny that we brought to ourselves because of our immoral lives.

Wow, great choice there. "Sure you can decide not to believe in God, but if you don't you'll burn in Hell".



Now, a few points unrelated to the above quotes. If for example a guy walking down the street sees a beautiful girl walking, and thinks "Man, I'd really like to kidnap her, rape her a and torture him for a few days", and means it seriously, not as a joke or a passing thought that anyone can have, but he's really prepared to do it, but then he doesn't because he's afraid of getting caught and going to jail, would you say he's a moral person? I wouldn't.

Now, you say that religion teaches morals by making people abide by the rules. But, IMO, that's not real morals, that's a fear of retribution, of punishment, same as in the example above, not real morals.

IMO, real morals can only exist in a state of complete lawlessness, where man is free to do what he wants how he wants, without any fear of punishment, by the state or by God. Only then can you see who is truly moral, and who acts morally without any outside influence, who doesn't kill, rape, steal even if he can.

Now, I'm not saying that would be a good society or that it's the way things should be, I'm only saying that only in these conditions can you really observe true morals.


2nd point. What about the people, nations, who did not know about the Bible, Qur'an, for example North American native, who had no exposure to today religions? They believed in multiple Gods and by todays understandings they should all go to Hell, even if they had no knowledge about today's religions.

Also, now we believe that the religions of ancient civilizations were wrong, the ancient Egyptians, the Maya, etc, etc. But who's to say that todays religions are the "correct" ones and that in 2000 years people won't look at them as we look at the religions before us, as false, ridiculous, etc?

Also, what about babies that die, being completely innocent creatures they go straight to heaven. Doesn't that give them an "unfair advantage"? Does it mean mothers should kill their babies at birth so they can go to hell? Doesn't mean it's unjust to other people who survived their childhood, because those babies passed the test without ever taking it? isnt that called cheating?


Enough from me for now.
 

Elvin

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2005
36,873
#66
Nein. The purpose of prison (unless it's life time imprisonment which is rare) is to rehabilitate someone. You punish by removing their freedom to live in the world. You also help them learn a skill, develop themselves, maybe pass the high school program if they were high school dropouts etc. Prison isn't a torture chamber, it's an attempt to "fix" what is preventing people from coping with life in society.

Hell is just defined as torture, and as Enron said, "punishment" is meaningless unless you give people a chance to behave better. The only other justification would be to scare off other people, but us living don't know who went to Hell, so that doesn't hold. We're left with pure sadism.
Well according to Islam not everybody goes to hell for eternity anyway,
there's a chance to go to heaven after you've burned all your sins, if you had even a little faith in God during your life.

So let's say if Hitler in the last minute of his life, just before dying asked for God's forgiveness for all he did... he will still burn in hell for centuries, but in the end will get his reward for that last minute of "submission" to God.

So, it is a place of rehabilitation for some, who've had at least one '+' in God's book :D

"So Merciful, that even Devil has hopes of Heaven"

^ The point is if you weren't a total ignorant SOB, who never even considered the possibility of being created by smth divine, you will go to heaven at one point, but do you really wanna know what it's like to be burned over and over again, before you're so full of regret you won't even enjoy the heaven that much anymore lol
 
OP
Martin

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #67
    What kills me is how back in the dark ages people were fanatical about baptizing babies especially when they had no hope of survival, purely so that the baby wouldn't go to hell for being a heathen. I guess being 2 days old is no excuse for not having a belief in god huh. But pour some water on his head and get a priests to say a few sentences and you go straight from hell to heaven. Sweet deal.

    It's a little shocking that anyone could think such superstition wasn't invented by man.
     

    Elvin

    Senior Member
    Nov 25, 2005
    36,873
    #68
    What kills me is how back in the dark ages people were fanatical about baptizing babies even they had no hope of survival, purely so that the baby wouldn't go to hell for being a heathen. I guess being 2 days old is no excuse for not having a belief in god huh. But pour some water on his head and get a priests to say a few sentences and you go straight from hell to heaven. Sweet deal.
    Well that's what Christians believe(d) in :lol: no offense, but come on...

    In Islam, everyone who dies before reaching puberty goes to heaven.
    No Original Sin bullshit, you don't pay for other's sins... never.
     
    OP
    Martin

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #69
    Well, Islam is later, so they took Christianity and tossed out some of the craziest things.
     

    Elvin

    Senior Member
    Nov 25, 2005
    36,873
    #70
    Well, Islam is later, so they took Christianity and tossed out some of the craziest things.
    hahaha

    Honestly, that were my thoughts too at first, and I'm still looking for smth that will discredit it (sorry mom :D).

    Haven't found anything that wouldn't make sense to me. Then again, I don't even know that much...
     
    OP
    Martin

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #71
    εℓ niño;1781068 said:
    hahaha

    Honestly, that were my thoughts too at first, and I'm still looking for smth that will discredit it (sorry mom :D).

    Haven't found anything that wouldn't make sense to me. Then again, I don't even know that much...
    Take a look at Judaism, the origins of Christianity. It's even more bizzarre and dogmatic. Can't ride in an elevator on the sabbath unless you have a Christian friend to push the buttons for you. And they have an explicit list of 200 something list of things that are forbidden, corresponding to the number of bones in the human body.
     

    Elvin

    Senior Member
    Nov 25, 2005
    36,873
    #73
    Take a look at Judaism, the origins of Christianity. It's even more bizzarre and dogmatic. Can't ride in an elevator on the sabbath unless you have a Christian friend to push the buttons for you. And they have an explicit list of 200 something list of things that are forbidden, corresponding to the number of bones in the human body.
    I don't believe Mouses and Jesus meant it to be like that. Bible has been butchered...

    Qur'an has never been changed nor adjusted.

    PS Have you guys seen "Zeitgeist" btw? :D
     

    Il Re

    -- 10 --
    Jan 13, 2005
    4,031
    #75
    εℓ niño;1781079 said:
    I don't believe Mouses and Jesus meant it to be like that. Bible has been butchered...

    Qur'an has never been changed nor adjusted.

    PS Have you guys seen "Zeitgeist" btw? :D
    yep, very interesting film
     
    OP
    Martin

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #77
    A pretty bold claim from someone who hasn't read the Qur'an.
    Haven't read the Bible either for that matter.

    Anyway, it's not a particularly shocking or novel idea. Basically, religion evolves. Judaism is one form that took shape, Christianity is a later version, Islam is the latest of them. Now if you're some kind of purist you may say that none of them have anything to do with each other and there's no way one could influence the next and just suggesting such a thing is zomg blasphemy. But realistically, knowing how culture evolves, that seems unlikely. Clearly, they weren't founded at the same time in distant locations that would have had no way to spread. Christianity's foundation in Judaism is particularly not controversial. But even Islam didn't start in China, it appeared a few thousand kilometers away from Israel, after 700 years.

    I've read some opinions that trace a lot of similarities between them.
     

    Zé Tahir

    JhoolayLaaaal!
    Moderator
    Dec 10, 2004
    29,281
    #78
    Haven't read the Bible either for that matter.

    Anyway, it's not a particularly shocking or novel idea. Basically, religion evolves. Judaism is one form that took shape, Christianity is a later version, Islam is the latest of them. Now if you're some kind of purist you may say that none of them have anything to do with each other and there's no way one could influence the next. But realistically, knowing how culture evolves, that seems unlikely. I've read some opinions that trace a lot of similarities between them.
    Of course they something to do with each other. But you'll only hear that from Muslims. We believe that God has sent over 100,000 prophets to the different corners of the earth.

    Just like a child learns how to ride a bicycle on three wheels and eventually moves down to two, God revealed his word piece by piece; as the human mind developed over time. Islam is considered that final religion.
     
    OP
    Martin

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #79
    Of course they something to do with each other. But you'll only hear that from Muslims. We believe that God has sent over 100,000 prophets to the different corners of the earth.
    Sounds like a logistical nightmare. And all 100,000 have been accounted for or are you still expecting some that have failed to show up? With such a high number the probability that all of them would successfully make it to their destination in that hostile ancient world is basically none, so that means bits and pieces of god's message must have been lost, like an incomplete puzzle.

    Yes, I'm having a lot of fun with this idea but you brought it on yourself this time :p

    Just like a child learns how to ride a bicycle on three wheels and eventually moves down to two, God revealed his word piece by piece; as the human mind developed over time. Islam is considered that final religion.
    So that means you reject with every fiber of your being the notion that a lot of things in Islam were adopted from Christianity?
     

    Zé Tahir

    JhoolayLaaaal!
    Moderator
    Dec 10, 2004
    29,281
    #80
    Sounds like a logistical nightmare. And all 100,000 have been accounted for or are you still expecting some that have failed to show up? With such a high number the probability that all of them would successfully make it to their destination in that hostile ancient world is basically none, so that means bits and pieces of god's message must have been lost, like an incomplete puzzle.

    Yes, I'm having a lot of fun with this idea but you brought it on yourself this time :p
    All 100,000+ were not mentioned in the Qur'an and no, no more are expected to come (other Muslims expect the arrival of Jesus but not me). I'm not sure what you mean by saying that they wouldn't make their destination in the hostile ancient world :confused:

    Just to list off some people that I believe were prophets of God were Confucius, Buddha, Krishna, Socrates, Baba Guru Nanak,etc.

    So that means you reject with every fiber of your being the notion that a lot of things in Islam were adopted from Christianity?
    Define what you mean by adopted in this situation.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 20)