What is your god like? (17 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
OP
Martin

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,261
    Pay more attention to the context Martin:)

    Mohammed is lie (or) Mohammed isn't lying = TRUE.

    I'm trying to prove Mohammed isn't lying but since 7 is wasting his time on proving NOTHING I thought I should give him a small hint;)
    You are trying to prove that Mohammed isn't lying by saying "Mohammed is lie (or) Mohammed isn't lying = TRUE"? This is your proof?
     

    Buy on AliExpress.com

    Fred

    Senior Member
    Oct 2, 2003
    41,113
    You're only defending him because he's muslim. Not even you think he's writing posts that make sense.
    I'm not defending anybody. Eariler I said that you always resort to insults in the end, you replied to me by saying that it was DP for life that resorts to insults, now you've contradicted yourself and proved me right.
     

    Seven

    In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
    Jun 25, 2003
    39,326
    I'm not defending anybody. Eariler I said that you always resort to insults in the end, you replied to me by saying that it was DP for life that resorts to insults, now you've contradicted yourself and proved me right.
    What is with muslims and the incapacity to understand the meaning of words?
     

    Seven

    In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
    Jun 25, 2003
    39,326
    Wait, i don't understand. So now you guys are saying Muhammad(PBUH) was lying, and that he wasn't illiterate?
    That's what we've always said.

    More accurately: we said it was a possibility.

    The conclusion was that DPFL had to prove two things:

    a) Muhammad was illiterate
    b) Muhammad acted alone

    He did no such thing.
     

    Fred

    Senior Member
    Oct 2, 2003
    41,113
    What is with muslims and the incapacity to understand the meaning of words?
    So you're associating muslims with stupidity right? As in when you're a muslim you have an incapacity to understand the meaning of words? Then when we say that you're a bigot, you say you're not?

    Actually just by looking at my sig, it shows your incapacity to look at anything objectively.
     

    Fred

    Senior Member
    Oct 2, 2003
    41,113
    That's what we've always said.

    More accurately: we said it was a possibility.

    The conclusion was that DPFL had to prove two things:

    a) Muhammad was illiterate
    b) Muhammad acted alone

    He did no such thing.
    The burden of proof was on him because......?


    You made the claim that there was a possibility that he faked the whole thing. So its on you to prove it.
     

    Seven

    In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
    Jun 25, 2003
    39,326
    The burden of proof was on him because......?


    You made the claim that there was a possibility that he faked the whole thing. So its on you to prove it.
    Because he said it wasn't possible. The burden of proof is on him, because he has to exclude the possibility.

    This is mere logics, fred.
     
    OP
    Martin

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,279
    The burden of proof was on him because......?
    Because he's claiming this to begin with.

    - So this guy got this book from god.
    - Prove it.
    - But he did.
    - He could be lying.
    - Prove that he was lying.

    wtf?

    How many more times do I have to paste that cartoon?
     

    Seven

    In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
    Jun 25, 2003
    39,326
    I am saying that he can't prove otherwise either. He made the claim, he should support it with evidence.
    I did. Joseph Smith.

    And my claim was that you can't prove he didn't lie.
    My claim was not that he lied.

    Two very different things.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 17)