What Are You Doing Right Now? (253 Viewers)
- Thread starter ßöмßäяðîëя
- Start date
- Tags gay space iliveforfinasteride iliveforjuve is not white loldevil size queens sweet matt is sweet errwhere virgin devil
The reason behind the 'aspartame causes cancer', is ridiculously hilarious.
Rats in nature have a certain lifespan. If you put them in labs, they grow 2-3 times as old, but once they are around twice their regular lifespan, they are quite susceptible to develop cancer. (compare it with alzheimers beeing an issue from the point people lived longer then 60).
Some study years and years ago, compared rats injected with insane dose of aspartane, to a reference population......However, the aspartane population where all old rats, the reference population where mostly younger/regular rats.
A few of the elder rats of the aspartane population developped a cancer.
FDA looked into it, trashed the research, went over tons of similar research and concluded there is absolutely no health risk involved with aspartane, and that its their most research substance on their additive list.
No one knows that the study was bullshit and trashed. Everybody remembers the false conclusion of a fraud research
Rats in nature have a certain lifespan. If you put them in labs, they grow 2-3 times as old, but once they are around twice their regular lifespan, they are quite susceptible to develop cancer. (compare it with alzheimers beeing an issue from the point people lived longer then 60).
Some study years and years ago, compared rats injected with insane dose of aspartane, to a reference population......However, the aspartane population where all old rats, the reference population where mostly younger/regular rats.
A few of the elder rats of the aspartane population developped a cancer.
FDA looked into it, trashed the research, went over tons of similar research and concluded there is absolutely no health risk involved with aspartane, and that its their most research substance on their additive list.
No one knows that the study was bullshit and trashed. Everybody remembers the false conclusion of a fraud research
Isn't that zero crap just as bad as the normal stuff?
Like it doesn't contain sugar itself, but makes your body wanna eat something sweet? Then you go and eat 3 chocolate bars.
That's irrelevant.
Anyways, the long term effect of artificial sweeteners is still something that is up in the air. But in the short term, they are a good replacement for sugar for people looking to lose weight, keep their diet in check or people with diabetes.
Now sugar on the other, that's a "killer": http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2003460
Anyways, the long term effect of artificial sweeteners is still something that is up in the air. But in the short term, they are a good replacement for sugar for people looking to lose weight, keep their diet in check or people with diabetes.
Now sugar on the other, that's a "killer": http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2003460
I think it's a more likely scenario that one might be drinking 4 diet cokes instead of 4 regular cokes, which is a great thing to do.
It tastes much better than regular coke or pepsi imo
As for the craving sugar part, like i said, if you are interested in diet products you'd probably watch what you eat throughout the day.
It tastes much better than regular coke or pepsi imo
As for the craving sugar part, like i said, if you are interested in diet products you'd probably watch what you eat throughout the day.
I think it's a more likely scenario that one might be drinking 4 diet cokes instead of 4 regular cokes, which is a great thing to do.
It tastes much better than regular coke or pepsi imo As for the craving sugar part, like i said, if you are interested in diet products you'd probably watch what you eat throughout the day.
It tastes much better than regular coke or pepsi imo
As for the craving sugar part, like i said, if you are interested in diet products you'd probably watch what you eat throughout the day.
That's the crucial bit I believe. There's an hypothesis that the opposite is true. Because people drink diet soda, they assume they're being healthy and eat a Snickers bar.
Also, all American sodas are horrible, because none of them have actual sugar in them, but HFCS. And the difference in taste is tremendous in my experience. I actually first learned this because I looked up what the fuck was wrong with American coke
.Actually it is. Hoori pointed out that switching from regular soda ie. sweetened with sugar (or similar caloric dense sweeterner) to an artificial sweetened alternative is "an excellent switch".
Now we now the effects of sugar on your body as well as the "easy calories" it provides; it can even be linked with a bunch of negative side effects such as cancer and hyperlipidemia. This means that for people with issues such as overweight, diabetes, and a "in general" unhealthy lifestyle (lack of exercise, smoking, high alcohol consumption etc.) it's the healthy* choice to switch from regular to diet.
*Long term effects of artificial sweeterners still unknown.
Now we now the effects of sugar on your body as well as the "easy calories" it provides; it can even be linked with a bunch of negative side effects such as cancer and hyperlipidemia. This means that for people with issues such as overweight, diabetes, and a "in general" unhealthy lifestyle (lack of exercise, smoking, high alcohol consumption etc.) it's the healthy* choice to switch from regular to diet.
*Long term effects of artificial sweeterners still unknown.