@X I've tried to look at this thing from every angle I could think of, but the only way I could see your point is that most of the children affected die not from a lack of calories technically speaking, but from a lack of certain nutrients or from diseases that can only kill them because their immune system has been so severely weakened by hunger.
So if you're being pedantic, and understanding starving as "dying from hunger", you have a point technically. But that's like saying no one has ever died from AIDS, because they're being killed by other diseases after their immune system has been sufficiently weakened.
So I really don't get your angle here. And I know one liners are cool and all, but sometimes it would really help if you explained your point a bit more in detail so that we don't have to guess so much of where you're coming from