I liked their music better when Peter was there. Was much more progressive. No doubt that Phil made them popular. But for me, music counts more than popularity, so maybe that's why I like Peter more.
I was listening to that on my iPod this morning (actually the song that prompted the question), but I think I would call it pop. If I were going to put it in rock, I'd say "soft rock".
But I guess it all depends on what you are using for a definition of rock, as it can potentially include punk, prog, pop, etc. I think of rock as being more like Metallica.
I was listening to that on my iPod this morning (actually the song that prompted the question), but I think I would call it pop. If I were going to put it in rock, I'd say "soft rock".
But I guess it all depends on what you are using for a definition of rock, as it can potentially include punk, prog, pop, etc. I think of rock as being more like Metallica.
I think this is just a matter of moving the goalposts. After all Elvis was the king of rock and roll and that was zomg radical in his time. Then rock was the step up from that and eventually a complete inflation took place with hard rock, very hard rock, heavy metal, black metal and god knows what else. Point is I would allege that Phil was easily rock in the 80s, no?
But if you say Phil is rock you're putting him in the same category as Rage Against the Machine or Slipknot, which isn't adequate either. That door swings both ways
For his time perhaps that was considered rockier, but nowadays the margins are not as clear.
Sheik Yerbouti said:
I just realized that Jesus He Knows Me is a satire on evangelism. Wow!
Well pop doesn't stay the same over the years. It just refers to music that is popular in a given time period. Genesis with Phil was much more accessible and commercial, which made them popular. I mean, they went from to 'I Can't Dance'. The difference in the style of music is quite obvious, and you can't say that both are the same.
But if you say Phil is rock you're putting him in the same category as Rage Against the Machine or Slipknot, which isn't adequate either. That door swings both ways
For his time perhaps that was considered rockier, but nowadays the margins are not as clear.
The rock genre is a very broad term. That's like calling Buffon and Knezevic footballers, but not acknowledging that one is a goalkeeper, and the other is a shitty defender.
Oh it's a damn fine tune. Along with a lot of 90's Genesis.
But if you ask me, I'd rather listen to something like .
Well pop doesn't stay the same over the years. It just refers to music that is popular in a given time period. Genesis with Phil was much more accessible and commercial, which made them popular. I mean, they went from THIS to 'I Can't Dance'. The difference in the style of music is quite obvious, and you can't say that both are the same.
Well pop doesn't stay the same over the years. It just refers to music that is popular in a given time period. Genesis with Phil was much more accessible and commercial, which made them popular. I mean, they went from THIS to 'I Can't Dance'. The difference in the style of music is quite obvious, and you can't say that both are the same.
That's a pretty useless definition though. It means that anything that has ever been popular is pop. Guy who beat two sticks together, Vivaldi's Four Seasons, Bach's church hymns, Elvis, Britney Spears. That's not a genre.
That's a pretty useless definition though. It means that anything that has ever been popular is pop. Vivaldi's Four Seasons, Bach's church hymns, Elvis, Britney Spears. That's not a genre.