Ford Prefect

Senior Member
May 28, 2009
10,557
Without the Freedom of Speech politics cannot exist. Men like Trey Parker and Matt Stone (although some of you may view it as immature) are some of the few willing to stick up for these basic rights and the fact that they have been censored is a sad comdenation on the society we now globally live in. Whilst i respect that it is your choice to not portray your prophet, no one has any right to tell someone else they cant. It is completely preposterous.
 

Quetzalcoatl

It ain't hard to tell
Aug 22, 2007
66,976
Without the Freedom of Speech politics cannot exist. Men like Trey Parker and Matt Stone (although some of you may view it as immature) are some of the few willing to stick up for these basic rights and the fact that they have been censored is a sad comdenation on the society we now globally live in. Whilst i respect that it is your choice to not portray your prophet, no one has any right to tell someone else they cant. It is completely preposterous.
1984 is happening
http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=3563
 

JBF

اختك يا زمن
Aug 5, 2006
18,451
Without the Freedom of Speech politics cannot exist. Men like Trey Parker and Matt Stone (although some of you may view it as immature) are some of the few willing to stick up for these basic rights and the fact that they have been censored is a sad comdenation on the society we now globally live in. Whilst i respect that it is your choice to not portray your prophet, no one has any right to tell someone else they cant. It is completely preposterous.
Excuse my arrogance but why the fuck would someone who's living in the 21st century in the free world he is in, attack a religious icon for muslims who lived about 1500 years ago, other than mock the followers of the religion?

And if you would accept someone making a comic show mocking you atheists calling you blood-asking terrorist who live in tents in the desert and know shit about civilization, then you sir would be saint.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
117,061
Excuse my arrogance but why the fuck would someone who's living in the 21st century in the free world he is in, attack a religious icon for muslims who lived about 1500 years ago, other than mock the followers of the religion?

And if you would accept someone making a comic show mocking you atheists calling you blood-asking terrorist who live in tents in the desert and know shit about civilization, then you sir would be saint.
Because nobody gives a fuck about some guy who lived 1500 years ago, you shouldn't expect us to respect him.
 

Ford Prefect

Senior Member
May 28, 2009
10,557
Excuse my arrogance but why the fuck would someone who's living in the 21st century in the free world he is in, attack a religious icon for muslims who lived about 1500 years ago, other than mock the followers of the religion?

And if you would accept someone making a comic show mocking you atheists calling you blood-asking terrorist who live in tents in the desert and know shit about civilization, then you sir would be saint.
But it isnt mocking Mohammed, it is mocking the culture of fear that has been brought about in recent years.

Do you not understand how important freedom of speech is Ze? Or are you just going to give me snarcky sarcastic remarks without substantiation?
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
71,085
Without the Freedom of Speech politics cannot exist. Men like Trey Parker and Matt Stone (although some of you may view it as immature) are some of the few willing to stick up for these basic rights and the fact that they have been censored is a sad comdenation on the society we now globally live in. Whilst i respect that it is your choice to not portray your prophet, no one has any right to tell someone else they cant. It is completely preposterous.

dude stop being so racist with "your" choice "your prophet" whats next "you" people?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 6, Guests: 228)