What Are You Doing Right Now? (478 Viewers)
- Thread starter ßöмßäяðîëя
- Start date
- Tags gay space iliveforfinasteride iliveforjuve is not white loldevil size queens sweet matt is sweet errwhere virgin devil
says the white boy from nor cal
London is higher for nearly all crimes, but on most statistics it comes across as lower because they are done against the populase normally as opposed to the actuall crimes commited, thats why places live glasgow, birmingham and manchester get rated high, also things happening in london dont really get reported. Strangley London is the city i feel safest in, suppose it is my city.
I know, America is lucky to have lax gunlaws
Because guns being legal actually curbs crime, or at least in the States. Take California for example, handguns are legal yet won't be for much longer, it is a liberal state and has some of the tightest gun restrictions in the country. Our big cities have some of the highest violent crime rates as well as home invasions and assaults. Compare that to Texas or Nevada, states with legal assault weapons, easily obtainable permits for concealed weapons, and a populace armed to the teeth with said firearms. Guns are so acceptable in these states that for 200$ anybody with a clean criminal background who takes a week long class can obtain a federal firearms license which allows them to buy virtually any gun they want including automatics.
Sounds crazy right? Actually these states have far less violent crimes (including those with guns involved), far less home invasions, less auto theft, and less personal assaults. Criminals in these states must think twice before acting because they know that anybody could be armed.
Gun laws may be put in place with good intentions but enforcing stricter measures only takes weapons out of the hands of law-abiding citizens making them less able to defend themselves, criminals are still easily able to obtain illegal firearms. Gun control in theory makes sense, but when the criminals can still get guns whats the point of preventing our populace from being able to protect themselves.
Because guns being legal actually curbs crime, or at least in the States. Take California for example, handguns are legal yet won't be for much longer, it is a liberal state and has some of the tightest gun restrictions in the country. Our big cities have some of the highest violent crime rates as well as home invasions and assaults. Compare that to Texas or Nevada, states with legal assault weapons, easily obtainable permits for concealed weapons, and a populace armed to the teeth with said firearms. Guns are so acceptable in these states that for 200$ anybody with a clean criminal background who takes a week long class can obtain a federal firearms license which allows them to buy virtually any gun they want including automatics.
Sounds crazy right? Actually these states have far less violent crimes (including those with guns involved), far less home invasions, less auto theft, and less personal assaults. Criminals in these states must think twice before acting because they know that anybody could be armed.
Gun laws may be put in place with good intentions but enforcing stricter measures only takes weapons out of the hands of law-abiding citizens making them less able to defend themselves, criminals are still easily able to obtain illegal firearms. Gun control in theory makes sense, but when the criminals can still get guns whats the point of preventing our populace from being able to protect themselves.