I don't know who she is.
Seriously lol.
EDIT:
Even if I was, you really think I'd be online here at the moment?
Buy on AliExpress.com
What Are You Doing Right Now? (731 Viewers)
- Thread starter ßöмßäяðîëя
- Start date
- Tags gay space iliveforfinasteride iliveforjuve is not white loldevil size queens sweet matt is sweet errwhere virgin devil
I don't know who she is.
Seriously lol.
EDIT:
Even if I was, you really think I'd be online here at the moment?
Buy on AliExpress.com
As I read through Ruby manuals to try to learn it myself, I've become convinced that people who invent new computer languages because it sounds like a nifty idea (or, for the hell of it) deserve to be put in front of firing squads.
We'll start with Mr. Yukihiro Matsimoto for having the egotistical gall of a clueless grad student and reinventing the programming wheel "to make programmers happy".
As if much of humanity would be better served if we created more verbal and written languages...
Do I sound like that much of a grump??
We'll start with Mr. Yukihiro Matsimoto for having the egotistical gall of a clueless grad student and reinventing the programming wheel "to make programmers happy".
As if much of humanity would be better served if we created more verbal and written languages...
Do I sound like that much of a grump??
As I read through Ruby manuals to try to learn it myself, I've become convinced that people who invent new computer languages because it sounds like a nifty idea (or, for the hell of it) deserve to be put in front of firing squads.
We'll start with Mr. Yukihiro Matsimoto for having the egotistical gall of a clueless grad student and reinventing the programming wheel "to make programmers happy".
As if much of humanity would be better served if we created more verbal and written languages...
Do I sound like that much of a grump??
We'll start with Mr. Yukihiro Matsimoto for having the egotistical gall of a clueless grad student and reinventing the programming wheel "to make programmers happy".
As if much of humanity would be better served if we created more verbal and written languages...
Do I sound like that much of a grump??
Matz is a hero to coders
(Granted, any poison is still a poison, but there's the most aggressive ones and there's the mildest ones, like ruby.)
Well, put it this way. You chose the absolute worst language to complain about. Ruby is just about the nicest, cleanest, most cozy language there is. It's one thing for Andy to bash c++ of fortran, those really are horrible languages. And I concur. But you can't handle ruby? Cmon, you're not even trying
Matz is a hero to coders
(Granted, any poison is still a poison, but there's the most aggressive ones and there's the mildest ones, like ruby.)
Matz is a hero to coders
(Granted, any poison is still a poison, but there's the most aggressive ones and there's the mildest ones, like ruby.)
Just that the answer to every problem in computer science simply cannot be the "ya*" pattern: "Yet Another ____".
Talk about running in place. It's a classic Not Invented Here problem. Many programmers are so lazy they will look to reinvent things rather than learn about something else, maybe modify it, and simply seek reuse first as a solution.
Not saying Matz isn't a nice, thoughtful guy here.
Just that the answer to every problem in computer science simply cannot be the "ya*" pattern: "Yet Another ____".
Talk about running in place. It's a classic Not Invented Here problem. Many programmers are so lazy they will look to reinvent things rather than learn about something else, maybe modify it, and simply seek reuse first as a solution.
Just that the answer to every problem in computer science simply cannot be the "ya*" pattern: "Yet Another ____".
Talk about running in place. It's a classic Not Invented Here problem. Many programmers are so lazy they will look to reinvent things rather than learn about something else, maybe modify it, and simply seek reuse first as a solution.
The truth is a lot of problems do merit new tools. If for no other reason than to address well known deficiencies in existing tools, which then get an incentive to fix those problems.
And frankly it actually takes less brain power to do something new within boundaries that you know inside out than to attempt grand unification efforts. Believe me, I've been there. Rather depend on one tool you wrote yourself than 6 different ones in their various versions, bugs, quirks and feature sets. As one guy put it, it rarely happens that an app takes off to the point where it becomes almost an operating system in itself, and then you know it'll live forever. Emacs is one, programmable to the last rubber band. Firefox is a modern example with all the extensions.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/sns-ap-bad-ham,0,3541427.story
nothings funnier than reality
nothings funnier than reality
Still complexity, man. The same guy didn't write the four different libs, various people did. People who don't know each other and maybe never even met. Not that there's any shortage of bad practice, thedailywtf.com is alive and kicking of course. But look at it this way. You're working on this piece of the system over here, this is your domain. You don't know the whole codebase, only god does. Whoever is managing you is supposed to vouch for your piece of the puzzle. If that guy knows nothing about other areas of the system then is it any wonder people duplicate things?
Well, put it this way. You chose the absolute worst language to complain about. Ruby is just about the nicest, cleanest, most cozy language there is. It's one thing for Andy to bash c++ of fortran, those really are horrible languages. And I concur. But you can't handle ruby? Cmon, you're not even trying
Matz is a hero to coders
(Granted, any poison is still a poison, but there's the most aggressive ones and there's the mildest ones, like ruby.)
Matz is a hero to coders
(Granted, any poison is still a poison, but there's the most aggressive ones and there's the mildest ones, like ruby.)
OP
OP