Really? I would think that something around 10''60 to 11'' is not that uncommon in men sprinters, which for women is world record times.
All in all a same level athlete male would have no competition against a female. I just can't think of any reason why would this thing even be considered as a bad though.
All this men and women are equal on every little thing imaginable is unreal and stupid.
- - - Updated - - -
you are so wrong.
been playing and not in the worst leauge.
but no one can compare it really, because no one of us has ever played against a female team i guess.
I have, many times. But when I was 14, we went on lots of trips with our football team and girls that were 2 years older around europe in many tournaments. And we played many exibition and even more training matches, we lost maybe once or twice and we were 2 years younger at the age of 13-14, so they were 16-17...
- - - Updated - - -
Oh, certainly if a woman centerback had to play against male forwards, it would be a different story.
But as Raz pointed out... the difference in the 100m at the Olympics is about a second among the tops in women vs men. The number of men who can break a sub-11-second 100m is pretty limited. In fact, among the Olympic men fielded in 2012, the top 60 qualifiers did beat the best woman's time. But that's just 60 men in the entire world of athletics and 25% of the Olympic-qualifying men could not beat that time.
How many women couldn't beat the 11 sec mark though?
I can't remember since it was long ago, but from my school there were quite a few who would run 100 meters in something 10 sec or so. would be interesting to know what is is the average for a school kid athlete for male and female.