What Are You Doing Right Now? (215 Viewers)
- Thread starter ßöмßäяðîëя
- Start date
- Tags gay space iliveforfinasteride iliveforjuve is not white loldevil size queens sweet matt is sweet errwhere virgin devil
Have you read 'Bad Science'?
His whole hypothesis is that he doesnt care if people want to buy stuff, but he does care about science, the scientific method and science reporting. When psuedo science is given attention as genuine science in the media it tampers with the public understanding of how science works and the scientific method. He isn't evangelic..he's just right lol.
I can't be bothered to look it up but i remember in his book "I do not care if people buy this stuff, I view it as an idiot tax and its their problem not mine"
Also on your last paragraph...do we really need those people in the human race? Can we not see it as natural selection - if you cant handle reality then grab a noose.
I read an interesting article a while back that said that if you in anyway deny the scientific method you should given a science tax - anything that science has given you since the scientific method was created you have to give back and live an amish lifestyle....its the fairest way to deal with creationists, homeopaths etc. If you are going to deny what this method is proving, why should you have be allowed to use the results of what it has given you. No ipod/computer/car/ for you mr homeopath.
His whole hypothesis is that he doesnt care if people want to buy stuff, but he does care about science, the scientific method and science reporting. When psuedo science is given attention as genuine science in the media it tampers with the public understanding of how science works and the scientific method. He isn't evangelic..he's just right lol.
I can't be bothered to look it up but i remember in his book "I do not care if people buy this stuff, I view it as an idiot tax and its their problem not mine"
Also on your last paragraph...do we really need those people in the human race? Can we not see it as natural selection - if you cant handle reality then grab a noose.
I read an interesting article a while back that said that if you in anyway deny the scientific method you should given a science tax - anything that science has given you since the scientific method was created you have to give back and live an amish lifestyle....its the fairest way to deal with creationists, homeopaths etc. If you are going to deny what this method is proving, why should you have be allowed to use the results of what it has given you. No ipod/computer/car/ for you mr homeopath.
Probably before you were born. 
But what I sense is that those people are given a faith-based ultimatum: either convert and believe in my form of rational thought or to the wolves with you.
There's a strong air of intolerance in that. It's no different from the Crusaders who told Muslims to convert to Christianity or face the sword. Not exactly enlightened means for rational thought, IMO.
That still won't stop the retards in this country who say science is the devil's work, but when they suddenly go to an infertility clinic and the woman gets impregnated with octuplets, it's suddenly "God's will" that they should all be born together despite the health risks on all the siblings. Somehow, it was never "God's will" that they should be infertile to begin with.
And while I like Charlie Brooker, I think his approach is insufferable and way too whiny for me. Maybe it's a British thing I don't get, but his incessant whining on TV makes me think of him as a brooding goth 14-year-old teenager in adult clothing.
But what I sense is that those people are given a faith-based ultimatum: either convert and believe in my form of rational thought or to the wolves with you.
There's a strong air of intolerance in that. It's no different from the Crusaders who told Muslims to convert to Christianity or face the sword. Not exactly enlightened means for rational thought, IMO.
That still won't stop the retards in this country who say science is the devil's work, but when they suddenly go to an infertility clinic and the woman gets impregnated with octuplets, it's suddenly "God's will" that they should all be born together despite the health risks on all the siblings. Somehow, it was never "God's will" that they should be infertile to begin with.
And while I like Charlie Brooker, I think his approach is insufferable and way too whiny for me. Maybe it's a British thing I don't get, but his incessant whining on TV makes me think of him as a brooding goth 14-year-old teenager in adult clothing.
Probably before you were born.
But what I sense is that those people are given a faith-based ultimatum: either convert and believe in my form of rational thought or to the wolves with you.
There's a strong air of intolerance in that. It's no different from the Crusaders who told Muslims to convert to Christianity or face the sword. Not exactly enlightened means for rational thought, IMO.
That still won't stop the retards in this country who say science is the devil's work, but when they suddenly go to an infertility clinic and the woman gets impregnated with octuplets, it's suddenly "God's will" that they should all be born together despite the health risks on all the siblings. Somehow, it was never "God's will" that they should be infertile to begin with.
And while I like Charlie Brooker, I think his approach is insufferable and way too whiny for me. Maybe it's a British thing I don't get, but his incessant whining on TV makes me think of him as a brooding goth 14-year-old teenager in adult clothing.
But what I sense is that those people are given a faith-based ultimatum: either convert and believe in my form of rational thought or to the wolves with you.
There's a strong air of intolerance in that. It's no different from the Crusaders who told Muslims to convert to Christianity or face the sword. Not exactly enlightened means for rational thought, IMO.
That still won't stop the retards in this country who say science is the devil's work, but when they suddenly go to an infertility clinic and the woman gets impregnated with octuplets, it's suddenly "God's will" that they should all be born together despite the health risks on all the siblings. Somehow, it was never "God's will" that they should be infertile to begin with.
And while I like Charlie Brooker, I think his approach is insufferable and way too whiny for me. Maybe it's a British thing I don't get, but his incessant whining on TV makes me think of him as a brooding goth 14-year-old teenager in adult clothing.
Live here for a bit, you're a smart guy...you'll come to love everything he says in comparison to the morons than broadcast in the place. Its his style of presenting and it achieves what he aims to
