VMware (11 Viewers)

OP
Wings

Wings

Banter era connoiseur
Contributor
Jul 15, 2002
21,543
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #3
    Cool. What do you use? Workstation or Esxi? I have 3 clusters on Esxi 3.5 & administrate them with Virtual Center 2.5 - Had 7 Windows Servers 2003 & 2 XP's on them. Currently testing Esxi 5 with 2 clusters & running 5 Windows 2008 servers & 1 Win 7. On I also have Workstation 8 on my lappy, testing Exchange server 2007 & 2010.
     
    Dec 31, 2008
    22,910
    #4
    :D
    Dude, I don't use VMware, we're designing Virtualized solutions for some of our customers here. Mainly using Essential Plus, Standard and Enterprise editions.
     
    OP
    Wings

    Wings

    Banter era connoiseur
    Contributor
    Jul 15, 2002
    21,543
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #5
    Haha. Just thought there was another enthusiast here. What type of virtualised solutions do you design?
     
    Apr 15, 2006
    56,640
    #6
    I installed VMWare so that I could run a test copy of Win 8 Consumer Preview for research related to my work. But the version I got is not compatible with it. Perhaps VMWare released a new update. I need to check later on.
     
    Dec 31, 2008
    22,910
    #7
    Haha. Just thought there was another enthusiast here. What type of virtualised solutions do you design?
    In one of the cases we have VMware Enterprise Edition in two Cisco Unified Computing System's for a local newspaper, therefore 6 VM's for their various purposes. VM cases are always :tup: as they always have a good margin+value for us.
     
    OP
    Wings

    Wings

    Banter era connoiseur
    Contributor
    Jul 15, 2002
    21,543
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #8
    Try Workstation 8.0.2 - I have Windows 8 CP installed on it.
     
    OP
    Wings

    Wings

    Banter era connoiseur
    Contributor
    Jul 15, 2002
    21,543
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #10
    In one of the cases we have VMware Enterprise Edition in two Cisco Unified Computing System's for a local newspaper, therefore 6 VM's for their various purposes. VM cases are always :tup: as they always have a good margin+value for us.
    Nothing like maximising hardware with virtualisering. I think VMware is going to be huge in the future. Do you host the servers or are they in the clients premises?

    ---------- Post added 09.03.2012 at 17:49 ----------

    Thanks for the info. I'll check it out.
    Anytime :)
     
    Dec 31, 2008
    22,910
    #11
    Nothing like maximising hardware with virtualisering. I think VMware is going to be huge in the future. Do you host the servers or are they in the clients premises?
    We basically design and sell the solution including all software licenses and hardware to our customer. Virtualisation is great, wonderful usage of the resources. And it's very good to see that more and more people are recognising this, vMotion and DRS are some features that customers have been specifically asking us nowadays.
     

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
    #12
    I started playing with vmware in 2001, learning linux. Used it for years, but always hated that every time you'd upgrade the kernel either on the host or the guest you'd have to recompile the kernel modules. These days I prefer virtualbox.
     
    OP
    Wings

    Wings

    Banter era connoiseur
    Contributor
    Jul 15, 2002
    21,543
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #15
    We basically design and sell the solution including all software licenses and hardware to our customer. Virtualisation is great, wonderful usage of the resources. And it's very good to see that more and more people are recognising this, vMotion and DRS are some features that customers have been specifically asking us nowadays.
    DRS, vMotion & vMotion Storage are really exciting technologies. What hardware solutions do you use for that? I tested Openfiler (Linux based NAS, SAN & Iscsi) but it was just too damn slow.

    I started playing with vmware in 2001, learning linux. Used it for years, but always hated that every time you'd upgrade the kernel either on the host or the guest you'd have to recompile the kernel modules. These days I prefer virtualbox.
    VMware has come a long way since but it has a lot of catching up to do when it comes to the free basic offering since VirtualBox is way better than VMware Play (the free version). But when it comes to enterprise solutions then VMware is the king.

    I use it on my laptop for testing purposes, it's great for that but a bit slow otherwise
    VirtualBox is actually better for day to day testing.

    I've always used Virtualbox; never tried VMware
    VMware comes into it's own when you install it directly on the host (Esxi versions) bypassing an extra host OS and saving resources. They have a tiny footprint but require an extra server to run the administration. Advantage is you that can cluster as many servers as you wish. All the resources are pooled together (DRS) & redundancy is well sorted (vMotion - you can move a VM from host to host without shutting it down & vMotion Storage - does same for storage). Not to mention HA (High Availability) - When a server crashes then the VM's running on it are restarted on the available resources minimising downtimes.
     
    Dec 31, 2008
    22,910
    #16
    DRS, vMotion & vMotion Storage are really exciting technologies. What hardware solutions do you use for that? I tested Openfiler (Linux based NAS, SAN & Iscsi) but it was just too damn slow.
    Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) is the one which we are working on right now.
     

    Siamak

    ╭∩╮( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)╭∩╮
    Aug 13, 2013
    18,306
    #17
    I've always used Virtualbox; never tried VMware
    I'm currently using VMware and I think I'll move to Virtualbox to see how smooth the experience is.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) is the one which we are working on right now.
    i'm working on Cisco Router and switches and ASA Firewall every day.

    - - - Updated - - -

    DRS, vMotion & vMotion Storage are really exciting technologies. What hardware solutions do you use for that? I tested Openfiler (Linux based NAS, SAN & Iscsi) but it was just too damn slow.


    VMware has come a long way since but it has a lot of catching up to do when it comes to the free basic offering since VirtualBox is way better than VMware Play (the free version). But when it comes to enterprise solutions then VMware is the king.


    VirtualBox is actually better for day to day testing.


    VMware comes into it's own when you install it directly on the host (Esxi versions) bypassing an extra host OS and saving resources. They have a tiny footprint but require an extra server to run the administration. Advantage is you that can cluster as many servers as you wish. All the resources are pooled together (DRS) & redundancy is well sorted (vMotion - you can move a VM from host to host without shutting it down & vMotion Storage - does same for storage). Not to mention HA (High Availability) - When a server crashes then the VM's running on it are restarted on the available resources minimising downtimes.
    Like HyperV.
     
    Last edited:

    Cerval

    Senior Member
    Feb 20, 2016
    26,829
    #18
    I'm currently using VMware and I think I'll move to Virtualbox to see how smooth the experience is.

    - - - Updated - - -


    i'm working on Cisco Router and switches and ASA Firewall every day.

    - - - Updated - - -


    Like HyperV.
    Don't you need a licence to use VMware? I've used Virtualbox and its simple to use.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 11)