US Presidential Elections thread - the fate of the world to be decided (37 Viewers)

[Lawnchair Bes]

makes you look like a racist

so if i get this straight, there are two able-bodied, black, young males who are named jerome and tyrone who are hanging around your streets, possibly selling drugs to children, waiting for obama to win so that they never have to work again.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

I call them as I see them....this is what exists in my city, and many other large cities

obviously you dont live here, so you have no clue, so stop being annoyed

I have been over a great portion of the US, and I must say that in terms of numbers, WHITEYS are much higher in terms of worthless persons.

 

[Bjerknes]

I think we should raise the taxes of the clowns who voted Republican the past 8 years. I think that's a fair result.

 

[Martin]

I have been over a great portion of the US, and I must say that in terms of numbers, WHITEYS are much higher in terms of worthless persons.

that's cause the blackies are in jail

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

42% agreement Gun control
67% agreement Environment
100% agreement Iraq
83% agreement Economy
100% agreement Income
25% agreement National security
92% agreement Family
50% agreement Immigration
92% agreement Health care
58% agreement Law and order
92% agreement Education
92% agreement Terrorism

 

[Bjerknes]

This is good stuff:

I'm a social liberalist which makes sense, along with some outlying factors in non-agreement.

100% agreement Gun control
67% agreement Environment
100% agreement Iraq
50% agreement Economy
67% agreement Income
50% agreement National security
75% agreement Family
83% agreement Immigration
92% agreement Health care
92% agreement Law and order
67% agreement Education
83% agreement Terrorism

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

How do you have 100% agreement on Gun Control?

 

[Bjerknes]

I think it means I agree 100% with Obama.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

I know, but that means you think that there should be no guns?

All semi-automatic guns should be illegal?

 

[Bjerknes]

Yep, I agree with that entirely. It works in other countries, that's for sure.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

So take away all those guns so only the criminals have them.....

 

[rounder]

I don't think there's a houshold in Lebanon that doesn't possess at least three different types of rifles, guns. But then again, we aren't exactly the country people should follow by example

 

[Bjerknes]

The thing is, most of the criminals get those weapons from people with clean records, mostly by stealing them.

Take a look at nations that have strict gun control and tell me who is better off.

We're a sick, sick nation when it comes to this stuff and the Constitution is not always represented truthfully by the Supreme Court Justices.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

I sleep with 17 baby-nukes under my bed.

 

[JCK]

I don't think there's a houshold in Lebanon that doesn't possess at least three different types of rifles, guns. But then again, we aren't exactly the country people should follow by example

We never had any single kind of weapon at home, not even toys. We were never ever involved with any kind of politics either. I tried a bit during my university life but that was mostly because of popularity in my department and the location of my apartment.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

The thing is, most of the criminals get those weapons from people with clean records, mostly by stealing them.

Take a look at nations that have strict gun control and tell me who is better off.

We're a sick, sick nation when it comes to this stuff and the Constitution is not always represented truthfully by the Supreme Court Justices.

Yea, but the fact still remains that criminals would have guns.

And I'm not talking about the Supreme Court.

 

[rounder]

42% agreement Gun control
67% agreement Environment
100% agreement Iraq
83% agreement Economy
100% agreement Income
25% agreement National security
92% agreement Family
50% agreement Immigration
92% agreement Health care
58% agreement Law and order
92% agreement Education
92% agreement Terrorism

This is good stuff:

I'm a social liberalist which makes sense, along with some outlying factors in non-agreement.

100% agreement Gun control
67% agreement Environment
100% agreement Iraq
50% agreement Economy
67% agreement Income
50% agreement National security
75% agreement Family
83% agreement Immigration
92% agreement Health care
92% agreement Law and order
67% agreement Education
83% agreement Terrorism

Why do some shift by 8% while others 9%?

 

[Bjerknes]

Yea, but the fact still remains that criminals would have guns.

And I'm not talking about the Supreme Court.

Reduce the amount of guns on the market, reduce the amount of guns in criminal hands. It's that simple and it works in nations that aren't so obsessed with a right to bear arms.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

Well they combine several different questions, so if one question is 5%, then a positive in one area and a negative in another would give you 2.5% or rounded to 3%.

That is why it is 66.6666 rounded to 67%, and so on.

 

[Martin]

So take away all those guns so only the criminals have them.....

The problem is you people are so in love with guns that you crave them worse than a drug addict craves drugs. The first step to solving the problem is to change the gun culture, or in other words, to get rid of it. In most countries gun ownership is a niche culture, a marginal group of people who hunt and whatever. Or conspiracy nuts perhaps. It's not a nationwide thing, and therefore there's not a gun on every door step.

Take smoking, it used to be a really widespread and accepted thing. Now, decades later, we have a whole different awareness about smoking, we know it's harmful, there are good reasons to be opposed, the conversation is a different one. That's the way to go, banning smoking alone won't do it.