The bolded part is what I meant. It's not that common knowledge to general public that much, that numbnuts like these can ignore it more. Sikhs and current day Nepalese Gurkhas gets mentionned in Brittish arm forces (natural warrior cultures).
But generally as a footnote, but not that surprising, minorities in armies tend get overshadowed in colonial times. Similar with black/Asian soldiers in the US army during that time.
Britain was completely devastated in WW2 and had a great stand against the Nazis. But I wouldn't think India are that grateful for leaving them at strong position. Churchill starved them to death, used up their resources, then had million of them as soldiers in his commonwealth army. The least to do at that point was give long awaited independency.
But generally as a footnote, but not that surprising, minorities in armies tend get overshadowed in colonial times. Similar with black/Asian soldiers in the US army during that time.
Britain was completely devastated in WW2 and had a great stand against the Nazis. But I wouldn't think India are that grateful for leaving them at strong position. Churchill starved them to death, used up their resources, then had million of them as soldiers in his commonwealth army. The least to do at that point was give long awaited independency.
My point wasn't that India should be grateful, but that other countries sacrificed a lot also. I'm not even going to touch on imperial horrors as it's a whole seperate entity. It's too simplistic or opportunistic to say that "if etc etc hadn't happened or contributed" the Allies would have lost, there were several points where this could have happened. We have to be greatful for all contributions.
