trez's replacement? (1 Viewer)

HelterSkelter

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2005
19,623
#1
we're talking abt the player whod replace neddy.
lets talk abt the one tht wud replace trez,when its looking very likely tht he'll leave in the summer.
gilardino wud probably be on the top of the list of his replacements.
any others?
what abt kezman?
he'll probably leave chelsea.
he's had a horrible time,but he's a much better player than the one we saw at chelsea.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
124,046
#3
Gilardino is the best replacement, but probably Moggi is considering Nonda to be the one.
 

Dan

Back & Quack
Mar 9, 2004
9,290
#5
Nonda would be a downgrade, but in terms of fiance selling trez and getting nonda would be a plus 10 MIL.

Kezman isnt a bad idea actually.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
124,046
#6
++ [ originally posted by Dan ] ++
Nonda would be a downgrade, but in terms of fiance selling trez and getting nonda would be a plus 10 MIL.

Kezman isnt a bad idea actually.
Oh yes!!! Kezman is not a bad idea, it is a horrible idea
 

Dan

Back & Quack
Mar 9, 2004
9,290
#7
**** that!! Mutu seemed crap at chelsea, as did Crespo. Im sure Kezman needs a better start somewhere else. His goal ratio in holland for one season was actually a GOAL a game.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
124,046
#10
How dare you compare Mutu and Crespo's failure in the EPL to Kezman's?

Those 2 were coming from the Serie A, Kezman was coming from Holland. I think there is a big difference here, right?
 
OP
HelterSkelter

HelterSkelter

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2005
19,623
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #11
    hey...players like dennis bergkamp,ronaldo and romario were MADE in holland.
    kezman isnt half as bad as his form wth chelsea sugests.
    and i agree with dan.
    crespo was a chelsea failure.but he's done brilliantly at milan.
    some players are just not suited to the fast english game that allows players very little time on the ball.
    kezman cud be a very decent buy.
     
    OP
    HelterSkelter

    HelterSkelter

    Senior Member
    Apr 15, 2005
    19,623
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #12
    ronaldo came straight from the dutch league into italy.
    romario came straight into the spanish league from holland.

    point : kezman is a very good player who's just not SUITED to the english game like so many other world class players who failed in the epl.
     

    Geof

    Senior Member
    May 14, 2004
    6,740
    #15
    I' don't agree with you Jeeks.

    Kezman is a very good player. How can you rate him on his Chealsea performances, he has only 10min once in a while to prove his worth.

    But our relationship with Chelsea cooled down a lot since the Mutu case... so a deal between the two clubs would be hard to get.

    Nonda would be real downgrade. That would mean we have to rely on DP-Zlatan with Zalayeta and Nonda as backup. Not enough I guess.

    And about the Holland issue, where did Zlatan play before Juve?
     

    Dan

    Back & Quack
    Mar 9, 2004
    9,290
    #17
    Crespo sucdeed in Serie A and flopped in the EPL. Kezman might just be a player for serie A.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)