I think you had an extra liking for Tiago, more then usual, but could be objective, but with this post, you just showed you arent no different from that Nedved fanboy Grande Pavel.
Insanely ridicolous thing to say Tiago was our best player when he was one of the worst ones. Mellberg, Buffon, the two strikers, Molinaro and Nedveds constant useful running (defensively, offensively they was cack), and Marchionni being quite useful when he came on, are just examples of players who were better for me.
Momo wasnt any good, Camo was nonexistant, Legro was sketchy, Chiellini was terrible with possession, but more useful then Tiago defensively (Tiago has stood his ground in refreshingly better games, but this game he was nonexistent defensively, and besides one excellent pass, was either giving away the ball, or shying from getting it), et etc, should I say more? How was he better then these players, in what way?
You have some who were supbar, some average, and some more useful then the othrs (with Mellberg the rock, the strikers and Gigi being top for me). Its quite clear which clear Tiago of this game belongs to, and he was one of the poorer ones of that group to boot.
Seriously, I understand sticking up for someone when they get bashed, but to say someone who had a very poor game to have been the best we had? Beyond fucking ridicolous, and as I said, no better then that Pavel fanboy, who atleast tries to sugar coat and gloss things to deflect from the average performances, never actually says he was the best Juve player when he was one of the worst ones.
Insanely ridicolous thing to say Tiago was our best player when he was one of the worst ones. Mellberg, Buffon, the two strikers, Molinaro and Nedveds constant useful running (defensively, offensively they was cack), and Marchionni being quite useful when he came on, are just examples of players who were better for me.
Momo wasnt any good, Camo was nonexistant, Legro was sketchy, Chiellini was terrible with possession, but more useful then Tiago defensively (Tiago has stood his ground in refreshingly better games, but this game he was nonexistent defensively, and besides one excellent pass, was either giving away the ball, or shying from getting it), et etc, should I say more? How was he better then these players, in what way?
You have some who were supbar, some average, and some more useful then the othrs (with Mellberg the rock, the strikers and Gigi being top for me). Its quite clear which clear Tiago of this game belongs to, and he was one of the poorer ones of that group to boot.
Seriously, I understand sticking up for someone when they get bashed, but to say someone who had a very poor game to have been the best we had? Beyond fucking ridicolous, and as I said, no better then that Pavel fanboy, who atleast tries to sugar coat and gloss things to deflect from the average performances, never actually says he was the best Juve player when he was one of the worst ones.
I got over exited because I saw so many people here bashing the shit out of him. All I wanted to say is that he was better than all of the other midfielders. I like tiago a lot but I'm no fan boy.
