The Wish List and General Discussion Thread (27 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
May 22, 2007
37,256
Now that's something I wouldn't mind to see.

Depends who's in front of Diego. I'd rather have Amauri than Pazzini.

If it has to be a new player then - Dzeko, Benzema :p
Meh, I'll make it a happier place in here.

Buffon
Cáceres-Bonucci-Chiellini-Criscito
Sánchez-Felipe Melo-Marchisio-Vargas
Diego
Džeko​

Would be worth 80m+ this summer. :scared:

Edit: Yeah 35m to make our midfield into that, for both Sánchez and Vargas.
 
May 4, 2004
11,622
REALLY.. How many of you thought that Giovinco will play?.. In a 4-4-2 Gio is to small to play there.. He is good in a 4-2-3-1 but not 4-4-2.. He has had 3 coaches, and non of them played him.. Dont get me wrong, i love Gio, but maybe its best for him to move on..


Vargas is definitely 20 m€ worth!..

Sanchez Melo Marchisio Vargas

Oh boy..
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,177
I don't like the look of that defence; doesn't really inspire much confidence. I don't want Vargas for 20 million; why waste that much money on a LW when you already have a very good player who loves the club in your ranks? This completely baffles me :shifty:
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,177
Why do we have to play 4-4-2? Aren't coached supposed to be able to adapt and be flexible based on the players they have? So much for earning so much yet sticking to the same shitty formation no matter what :shifty:
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,011
I don't like the look of that defence; doesn't really inspire much confidence. I don't want Vargas for 20 million; why waste that much money on a LW when you already have a very good player who loves the club in your ranks? This completely baffles me :shifty:
I can see why they do that.

Giovinco is more suited for 4-2-3-1 and Del Neri wants to have powerful wingers probably, which Seba sadly isn't.

They want somebody with a great cross to feed strikers and someone who has a good shot. It's Vargas indeed.
 
May 4, 2004
11,622
Why do we have to play 4-4-2? Aren't coached supposed to be able to adapt and be flexible based on the players they have? So much for earning so much yet sticking to the same shitty formation no matter what :shifty:
We will not play a flat 4-4-2.. It changes when we attack, to a 4-2-4 or 4-2-3-1.. while we might defend in a 4-4-1-1 way.. Vargas IS better then Giovinco in a 4-4-2 !
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 22)