REALLY.. How many of you thought that Giovinco will play?.. In a 4-4-2 Gio is to small to play there.. He is good in a 4-2-3-1 but not 4-4-2.. He has had 3 coaches, and non of them played him.. Dont get me wrong, i love Gio, but maybe its best for him to move on..
I don't like the look of that defence; doesn't really inspire much confidence. I don't want Vargas for 20 million; why waste that much money on a LW when you already have a very good player who loves the club in your ranks? This completely baffles me
I don't like the look of that defence; doesn't really inspire much confidence. I don't want Vargas for 20 million; why waste that much money on a LW when you already have a very good player who loves the club in your ranks? This completely baffles me
Why do we have to play 4-4-2? Aren't coached supposed to be able to adapt and be flexible based on the players they have? So much for earning so much yet sticking to the same shitty formation no matter what
I don't like the look of that defence; doesn't really inspire much confidence. I don't want Vargas for 20 million; why waste that much money on a LW when you already have a very good player who loves the club in your ranks? This completely baffles me
He is fast, pacey, a good dribbler, and can whip in a good cross. His physique and stamina are concerns, but I think he can be a good LW, or a LWF in a 4-2-3-1 formation.
Why do we have to play 4-4-2? Aren't coached supposed to be able to adapt and be flexible based on the players they have? So much for earning so much yet sticking to the same shitty formation no matter what
We will not play a flat 4-4-2.. It changes when we attack, to a 4-2-4 or 4-2-3-1.. while we might defend in a 4-4-1-1 way.. Vargas IS better then Giovinco in a 4-4-2 !