The Official Weather Thread: Andy's Haven (5 Viewers)

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,664
#83
I loved how Bush was like. "It's 5 months to go and I still don't care about black people".

I really hope W comes out just before the election.


(W is Oliver Stones movie about W, played be Josh Brolin)
 
OP
Bjerknes

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,146
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #84
    I say let the Belgians handle our disaster situations.

    Either them or the Chinese.

    You know, just like we sold the security rights to our ports to that Dubai firm.
     

    Seven

    In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
    Jun 25, 2003
    39,343
    #85
    I say let the Belgians handle our disaster situations.

    Either them or the Chinese.

    You know, just like we sold the security rights to our ports to that Dubai firm.
    The Dutch are usually quite solid in that area, as are Scandinavians. And I'm not joking this time.
     
    OP
    Bjerknes

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,146
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #86
    The Dutch are the best. But then again, they have about 2000 miles less of coastline to protect than we do.
     

    Alen

    Ѕenior Аdmin
    Apr 2, 2007
    53,998
    #87
    You should have never bought Louisiana from Napoleon.

    And during the first few pages of this topic i thought i was reading "The Three Little Pigs"
     

    Seven

    In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
    Jun 25, 2003
    39,343
    #88
    The Dutch are the best. But then again, they have about 2000 miles less of coastline to protect than we do.
    I know you keep bringing up that argument and obviously there is some truth to it, but then again you also have more people and more means. Besides, you only have to protect those places where people actually live. It's a bit more difficult to organise, I admit, but it's not an excuse.
     
    OP
    Bjerknes

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,146
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #91
    I know you keep bringing up that argument and obviously there is some truth to it, but then again you also have more people and more means. Besides, you only have to protect those places where people actually live. It's a bit more difficult to organise, I admit, but it's not an excuse.
    OK, lets travel from the West to the East along the coast in Hurricane Zones. Brownsville, Corpus Christie, Galveston, New Orleans, Gulfport, Mobile, Pascagoula, Pensacola, Panama City, Tampa, Sarasota, Miami all the way to Palm Bay, Savannah, Wilmington, Virginia Beach, and Ocean City are all cities over 50,000 people that sit in the midst of a hurricane threat. Some sit below sea level. To protect all these cities from erosion and storm surge by damming technology would be potentially the biggest project in US history.

    This project would only be feasible in a few places, but in reality the entire coastline has residents who are subject to hurricanes. That's just one of the hazards we have to deal with.

    yeah, how could they. everyone knows dubaians are all darkie terrorists.
    You know that's not what I mean, so don't put words in my mouth.
     

    Seven

    In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
    Jun 25, 2003
    39,343
    #92
    OK, lets travel from the West to the East along the coast in Hurricane Zones. Brownsville, Corpus Christie, Galveston, New Orleans, Gulfport, Mobile, Pascagoula, Pensacola, Panama City, Tampa, Sarasota, Miami all the way to Palm Bay, Savannah, Wilmington, Virginia Beach, and Ocean City are all cities over 50,000 people that sit in the midst of a hurricane threat. Some sit below sea level. To protect all these cities from erosion and storm surge by damming technology would be potentially the biggest project in US history.

    This project would only be feasible in a few places, but in reality the entire coastline has residents who are subject to hurricanes. That's just one of the hazards we have to deal with.



    You know that's not what I mean, so don't put words in my mouth.
    That's all true, but you also have huge pieces of land in the US that barely have any inhabitants and are safer than those areas. If people are going to live there, you have to find a way to protect them. I feel there is too much confidence in well.. people who are less intelligent. I mean, it's not like you are going to buy a poorly structured house in a hurricane zone.

    It's what I've said before, a lot of people in America are idiots and are being kept idiots. Now I don't know what it is, but almost every reportage we get on tv here of a state like Alabama for instance shows stupidity and violence. Now I can imagine some moron from Alabama, with presumeably no education whatsoever, moving to New Orleans (that is, if he would actually move from Alabama of course).

    I don't know if it's his fault or not, but that's a reality you see. We have our fair share of idiots in Belgium, but I'd like to believe they get a lot of information when it comes to their safety.
     
    OP
    Bjerknes

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,146
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #95
    That's all true, but you also have huge pieces of land in the US that barely have any inhabitants and are safer than those areas. If people are going to live there, you have to find a way to protect them. I feel there is too much confidence in well.. people who are less intelligent. I mean, it's not like you are going to buy a poorly structured house in a hurricane zone.

    It's what I've said before, a lot of people in America are idiots and are being kept idiots. Now I don't know what it is, but almost every reportage we get on tv here of a state like Alabama for instance shows stupidity and violence. Now I can imagine some moron from Alabama, with presumeably no education whatsoever, moving to New Orleans (that is, if he would actually move from Alabama of course).

    I don't know if it's his fault or not, but that's a reality you see. We have our fair share of idiots in Belgium, but I'd like to believe they get a lot of information when it comes to their safety.
    You're making this seem simpler than it is. For many people, they have to move where the jobs are, not because they want to. All the big jobs are in big cities of course, so that's where people flock to to earn a living. Hurricanes and other natural disasters is probably the last thing on your mind.

    If we're going to bash the intelligence of Americans for having houses in hurricane zones, that means we could bash Americans and the Chinese for building houses along fault lines subject to shifts in tectonic plates, Africans and Southern Asians for building homes in places susceptible to plague and famine, and island inhabitants for building in spite of Tsunami fears. Anybody is subject to natural disasters.

    While I know Americans have more means than many in the world, sometimes you can't choose where you live. A mass exodus from hurricane zones would not be feasible, neither would building all homes out of brick. Many Americans are indeed stupid, but a lot of what happens due to mother nature is beyond their control.

    i know. but it does sound bad. one would expect vinman saying that
    Sorry that our economy is doing so poorly right now that I object giving away contracts to even more foreign companies. By the year 2020 the whole United States will probably be owned by Dubai and Abu Dhabi.
     

    JCK

    Biased
    JCK
    May 11, 2004
    125,388
    #98
    Sorry that our economy is doing so poorly right now that I object giving away contracts to even more foreign companies. By the year 2020 the whole United States will probably be owned by Dubai and Abu Dhabi.
    Setting up the demand on oil so high is helping achieve that, sometimes things backfire but not everyone sees that.
     
    OP
    Bjerknes

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,146
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #99
    Setting up the demand on oil so high is helping achieve that, sometimes things backfire but not everyone sees that.
    I see it, and then I see a lot of dummies trying to figure out how to stop something that is impossible.

    Watching CNBC right now, I hear a guy saying, "Thank Goodness for a Global Economy."

    Well, the global economy has cycles, and we're not doing too well right now.
     

    JCK

    Biased
    JCK
    May 11, 2004
    125,388
    I didn't mean that you don't see it, actually normal people see it more than leaders do. As for global economy it craves a lot for it to be successful and how the world is now it's definitely not the correct formula.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 5)