"Im not sure whether this should be topical discussion or a movie thread. This 'Film' was the biggest compilation of lies, deciets and illusions i think iv ever seen, its almost as bad a "loose change". A couple of things to note, this 'documentary' is very selective about what evidence it provides you with and when it does give you evidence, it doesnt give you the whole thing unless it actually specifically agrees with that they say, this happeneds once in the whol documentary. This may sound obssesive but i am not a passive audience member, i am not going to sit their and just believe what they say because they put 80s horror music on in the background with scary images of hitler. I looked up every single article they cite in the documentary and only one of them actually said what they claimed it said, and its relevance to the line arguement is next to none. A key example of this is when they claim that a member of the Bilderberg Group has issued a statement to London Financial Times saying that after 15 years of secrets they are openly admiting they are pushing for a new world order. First thing to note is that the person that they claim issued a statement actually writes for the Financial Times and secondly that this artical doesnt say, it is an article about what would happen if there were to be a new world order, the reason it was used was because the title sounded suspicious to anyone with an iq bellow sleepy's and suprisingly they only showed the title in the film and not the actual artical. Every artical i looked up was the same thing, some of them were absolutley nothing to do with what they were saying.
If you watch it or do watch it, please be aware that what they are saying IS NOT fact, it is NOT TRUE, it is a clear example of why circumstancial evidence does not stand up in the judicial system. Another thing to notice is that these are the people that have been harrasing george bush for the last 8 years and co-incidentaly the only 'experts' they could get involved were people that believe 9/11 was a government attack and rap singers, and the two groups over-lapped a fair bit aswell. I personally cannot use these people to dictate what i believe when they are clearly not in a state of sound mind. Another area in which we can see retarded evidence being used is....They go through members of the US cabinet and tell you what groups they are members off. It says that your minister for foreign relations is a member of the Foreign Relations Commitee ....And that the person who is in charge of the economy used to work on wall street Shocked i mean FUUUUUUCK people who would logically be doing these jobs are doing them....this means .....THEY ARE TAKING OVER THE WORLD
Just to balance what iv said, what they are saying isnt too far-fetched, it is logical that this MIGHT happen, but if they cannot provide evidence for what they are saying then i dont see why it should be taken seriously, if that documentary were an essay submited to a university i seriously believe it would fail but its making stuff up and not justifying it. Another thing is that if there were plans for the Bilderberg Group to make this New World Order, we are never once told why this is a bad thing, globalisation is a great thing that is bringing our world together to stop fighting between each other that we saw in the 20th century, we are now able to meet in summits like G20 next week to talk about our problems, the only thing that is bad about it, is when you get xenophobic cunts making films."