Wait why would a Boston fan be cocky? Litterally have the tools, assets and timing to become proper ambitious side but they don't. Seem to be too busy being content with going to conference finals and boarding prime picks. What's the end game exactly?
Btw who will they pick? Fulltz to be baby IT when they already have similar point guard? Tho they could use more offensive power amongst guards since their options are mainly defensive role players.
Or smarter if they draft that pick for a star player.
Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk
The end game is long term success ala the Spurs. True star players are not available for a trade and the likes of Butler and George alone will not make the Celtics a true contender anyway, while costing them an arm and a leg. Chicago is rumored to have asked for both Nets picks this and next year (probably another top-3 pick) for Butler. And then the Celts would have no guarantee they would be able to keep Butler/George for the long run even if they were worth trading for.
Point is, star players who would be worth giving up those picks for, are simply not available for a trade. The star players who are on the trading block, aren't good enough to dethrone the Cavs anyway and will cost so much that acquiring them will hurt the Celts chances for sustained success.
The Celts, if they trade for say Butler, can try and turn that Nets trade into a 1-2 year competitive window with the Cavs, or they can aim higher and try to patently build a perennial contender.
- - - Updated - - -
Number 1 seed that's likely to get swept in the ECFs. Y'all got number 1 because the Cavs didn't give two hoots.
And please. I've been a Lakers fan since I was 4 years old and the 88' title. The 90s sucked for both you and I.
Ok, say #2 seed in the East - does that change anything about what I said earlier?
