The Mod Thread ("because for some reason,you think we actually care") (24 Viewers)

[Seven]

Actually I don't think it is since your friend took it and tagged it.

Dude, are you a fucking moron? It's not about who took the picture.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Enron]

Dude, are you a fucking moron? It's not about who took the picture.

Easy Sanchez. No need to get fired up.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

Then the paparazzi would all be arrested, dickless

 

[Seven]

Easy Sanchez. No need to get fired up.

The guy doesn't know the first thing about law, but he's all arrogant about this. He's wrong. Plain and simple.

Then the paparazzi would all be arrested, dickless

No, as I just told you, they're public figures. An exception is made.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

Then the paparazzi would all be arrested, dickless

its not illegal to take pics but its illegal to publish them, so in theory hes right in saying it's illegal for you to post his pic without his consent

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

But I'm a huge fan of you!

 

[Alen]

Seven, really, why is it such a problem? In Burke's place I will try to stop this from going on and on and I'd change the avatar, but I don't see your problem with it. We know how you look anyway.
Plus, it's not like anyone can make fun of how you look.

 

[Seven]

Just so you know, facebook's policy means that the picture itself is facebook's property. They could technically sue you too. They sue you for the use of this particular picture, I sue you because you used my image when I told you not to.

That's the law when I post things on facebook, not whatever fiction you think it might be.

 

[king Ale]

Well I guess Seven is right. Why don't you simply remove his pic Burke?

How could Burke have an access to that pic btw?

 

[Seven]

Seven, really, why is it such a problem? In Burke's place I will try to stop this from going on and on and I'd change the avatar, but don't see your problem with it. We know how you look anyway.
Plus, it's not like anyone can make fun of how you look.

The point is that he should have asked. Had he asked I would probably have said yes anyway.

 

[Nicholas]

Well I guess Seven is right. Why don't you simply remove his pic Burke?

How could Burke have an access to that pic btw?

Screenshot the screen?

Copy and paste it then save it?

Perhaps I don't know. Burke is a clever Mo-Fo.

 

[Seven]

Well I guess Seven is right. Why don't you simply remove his pic Burke?

How could Burke have an access to that pic btw?

Because it's on facebook. Which is not "the internet", which is not "public domain".

 

[Alen]

The point is that he should have asked. Had he asked I would probably have said yes anyway.

I get it. But now that he didn't ask you, he still has your picture and you made it clear that you don't want something similar to happen without your permission (Actually, the same goes for every single member's picture here), is it still a problem that he has it?

 

[Seven]

I get it. But now that he didn't ask you, he still has your picture and you made it clear that you don't want something similar to happen without your permission (Actually, the same goes for every single member's picture here), is it still a problem that he has it?

You mean that it doesn't matter anymore now, because everyone has seen it anyway?

Yes, it does matter. I'm not satisfied with Burke's intentions when using the picture.

 

[Nicholas]

This is why Facebook can get anal at times.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

Just so you know, facebook's policy means that the picture itself is facebook's property. They could technically sue you too. They sue you for the use of this particular picture, I sue you because you used my image when I told you not to.

That's the law when I post things on facebook, not whatever fiction you think it might be.

Photographing private property from within the public domain is legal, with the exception of an area that is generally regarded as private, such as a bedroom, bathroom, or hotel room[37]. In some states, there is no definition of "private," in which case there is a general expectation of privacy. Should the subjects not attempt to conceal their private affairs, their actions immediately become public to a photographer using an average lens or video camera.

Just in general sense, the "public figure" shit you mentions is not mentioned herein.

Well I guess Seven is right. Why don't you simply remove his pic Burke?

How could Burke have an access to that pic btw?

Just to annoy him.

Because I'm his friend on facebook.

Because it's on facebook. Which is not "the internet", which is not "public domain".

Facebook is a public domain, anyone can join.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

You mean that it doesn't matter anymore now, because everyone has seen it anyway?

Yes, it does matter. I'm not satisfied with Burke's intentions when using the picture.

Okay, so now you know my intentions...

What are/were they.

EDIT: Cheating, I already said my intentions.

 

[Seven]

Photographing private property from within the public domain is legal, with the exception of an area that is generally regarded as private, such as a bedroom, bathroom, or hotel room[37]. In some states, there is no definition of "private," in which case there is a general expectation of privacy. Should the subjects not attempt to conceal their private affairs, their actions immediately become public to a photographer using an average lens or video camera.

Just in general sense, the "public figure" shit you mentions is not mentioned herein.

Just to annoy him.

Because I'm his friend on facebook.


Facebook is a public domain, anyone can join.

That's it. You really are just a moron. The first bit talks about photographing, not publishing. So there you go. My God, can you even read, Burke? When exactly did you take this picture?

You're not my friend on facebook. And facebook is not a public domain. What is definitely NOT a public domain anyway is my circle of friends on facebook. Another thing: do you even know what public domain means?

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

Well, I can promise I won't change your signature anymore, but I'm not taking down my photo of you.

It is after all, a picture of a picture.

 

[Seven]

Well, I can promise I won't change your signature anymore, but I'm not taking down my photo of you.

It is after all, a picture of a picture.

Which, again, means nothing. Why are you so stupid?