Thats a shit load of responses so i'll give a general reply as i am too lazy to quote each.
Camo and Kuyt are completely different. Even if both play in the same position.. rafa benitez uses Kuyt in building up play and adding pace to the game. He needs him as a constant menace regardless of whether he scored or not. Think of him the way Ferguson uses Park but way more productive and annoying.
Kuyt is less talented but more consistent and literally never gets injured. did i mention he was the dutch league's top scorer once?
Camo on form is better than kuyt but how often does camo play on form?
i think if we had kuyt he would give us more of his services as he never misses a game in all competitions and is amazingly consistent. Camo at his peak is probably better than Kuyt but his numerous injuries and inconsistency makes him less useful for the team.
SO .. we here have a talented player (camo) who is amazing on form but is injured most of the seasons and inconsistent.
against a less talented player that plays good (less than camo on form) but provides his service every match at an amazingly consistent rate and literally never gets injured.
ashley young is a super talented guy that scores and assists in huge amounts and is consistent (not kuyt consistent but still very consistent relatively to camo) He rarely gets injured and is still at the beginning of his career and still has a lot to fulfill.
Ashley young IS better than the current camo. We can also say an on form ashley young at this age is equivalent to an on form camo from the old days.
I am sorry guys but try avoiding your juve bias.. Young is the next big thing twice EPL PLAYER OF THE MONTH so far this year alone and still improving.
Someone mentioned that the italian national team is better than the english... if you read my posts you should have noticed i did mention that they are better as a group (a team) but on the individual talent england is better. In other words, if you are trying to enter the english squad its harder than entering the italian squad even if italy as a team plays better. Remember that there is no one single player that was on the UEFA team of the season from italy.
Further, An on form walcott is unstoppable.. he may be inconsistent but so is camo and they both get injured a lot. Walcott on form is better than camo on form IMO... he single handedly turns matches around with his incredible speed, pace and crosses. A reminder that he is very very young and still have so much to achieve and will get better with age.. experience is a huge aspect.
I may have exaggerated with valencia as it is his first year to shine. He is brilliant but we have to see him for 2 consecutive seasons at least to judge him properly. Sorry for this one. Lampard plays on the left sometimes but never a winger sorry for that one too (i am surprised from the guy that said camo was greater though

). Finally, my position mix ups i told you about before we started the argument in my first original post.
In conclusion, on camo VS. Young and Kuyt
Young: is better than camo and still has a lot of time ahead of him to win and already has more individual honors than camo. More Goals, More assists and more consistent. Young is more talented just needs some experience and is on the right path.
Kuyt: less talented than Camo however, he is amazingly consistent and never gets injured unlike camo. Therefore, camo has more talent but Kuyt is more useful. Lets not say someone is better as both have many +ve and -ve sides.
Agreed? :shy: