The Financial Situation (28 Viewers)

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
Not really.

The put some money in to help fund transfers last summer and contribute to the new stadium.

I believe that was their first contribution for several years, though.
 
Aug 22, 2008
158
Not really.

The put some money in to help fund transfers last summer and contribute to the new stadium.

I believe that was their first contribution for several years, though.
I think we would be better off without Fiat, as they are not intrested in investing in the club. For instance, we could have signed Alonso for 16million, we offered 14million, we could'nt sign him as Elkann did not want to put in money, therefore we had to settle for the cheaper & lesser option in Poulsen. The IFIL do not even invest in our club, As soon as Gianni & Umberto agnelli died, the shareholders withdraw thier financial support, even Moggi stated this when he was general manager. Where was Elkann during the outbreak of "Farsopoli"? As long as Fiat own Juve, the likes of Secco will remain at the club, and will continue to waste the clubs money.
 

Ahmed

Principino
Sep 3, 2006
47,928
money isn't the issue, its who we invest in that counts...if someone wouldn't mind digging up the transfer fees of this season and last year, you will see that we have invested quite heavily...I think it was 43 million Euros last year, which is quite a lot
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
I think we would be better off without Fiat, as they are not intrested in investing in the club. For instance, we could have signed Alonso for 16million, we offered 14million, we could'nt sign him as Elkann did not want to put in money, therefore we had to settle for the cheaper & lesser option in Poulsen. The IFIL do not even invest in our club, As soon as Gianni & Umberto agnelli died, the shareholders withdraw thier financial support, even Moggi stated this when he was general manager. Where was Elkann during the outbreak of "Farsopoli"? As long as Fiat own Juve, the likes of Secco will remain at the club, and will continue to waste the clubs money.
I've no doubt that IFIL would be happy to sell Juve if they recieved a decent offer.
 
Aug 22, 2008
158
money isn't the issue, its who we invest in that counts...if someone wouldn't mind digging up the transfer fees of this season and last year, you will see that we have invested quite heavily...I think it was 43 million Euros last year, which is quite a lot
Money is the issue this year aswell, we've only spent 32million, a season where we are in the CL, and 25million euros of that 32million was from the CL. Elkann has only put 8million euros in the club. If Fiat were intrested in the club why is that know one is being held accountable for the terrible signings made? The sooner Juve cut ties with Fiat and get a proper backer on board, that will enable it to be competive, the better.
 

C4ISR

Senior Member
Dec 18, 2005
2,362
I think we would be better off without Fiat, as they are not intrested in investing in the club. For instance, we could have signed Alonso for 16million, we offered 14million, we could'nt sign him as Elkann did not want to put in money, therefore we had to settle for the cheaper & lesser option in Poulsen. The IFIL do not even invest in our club, As soon as Gianni & Umberto agnelli died, the shareholders withdraw thier financial support, even Moggi stated this when he was general manager. Where was Elkann during the outbreak of "Farsopoli"? As long as Fiat own Juve, the likes of Secco will remain at the club, and will continue to waste the clubs money.
Every1 wants an Abramovich, but they ignore the balance books. Chelsea, Milan, etc can spend w/e they want, but they're not sustainable and would fold if it were not for their owners.

Id rather Juventus be financially sustainable than go under because some of our fans want to play fantasy football.
 

Geof

Senior Member
May 14, 2004
6,740
Grande le Zebre, I will never understand people like you. Would you really want your club to be owned single-handedly by some rich lunatic?
 

Gazzo

Senior Member
Jul 9, 2007
1,745
Money is the issue this year aswell, we've only spent 32million, a season where we are in the CL, and 25million euros of that 32million was from the CL. Elkann has only put 8million euros in the club. If Fiat were intrested in the club why is that know one is being held accountable for the terrible signings made? The sooner Juve cut ties with Fiat and get a proper backer on board, that will enable it to be competive, the better.
Nearly every point you've made so far is completely and utterly incorrect, which I'm not suprised given how badly us fans are informed from the terrible media outlets but nonetheless you have no idea .. But what I will agree on is that we've haven't spent our money wisely but that's painfully obvious
 
Aug 22, 2008
158
Grande le Zebre, I will never understand people like you. Would you really want your club to be owned single-handedly by some rich lunatic?
What would you prefer Juve were owned by people with no ambition, who have no long or short term plan for the club? and who persist with imbeciles like Secco in charge with our transfers? Because that's what Elkann is doing for the club. Under Elkann and idiots like Secco at the club, we will never win a scudetto or CL.
 

LEC

Senior Member
Sep 6, 2002
886
What would you prefer Juve were owned by people with no ambition, who have no long or short term plan for the club? and who persist with imbeciles like Secco in charge with our transfers? Because that's what Elkann is doing for the club. Under Elkann and idiots like Secco at the club, we will never win a scudetto or CL.
imo lets play this season first before judge our board

last year it was obviously not possible to finish 1st
lets wait and see what happen this term..I belive we can go far

..at the end iam happy with the players we got and i cannot wait to see gio, marchisio an de ceglie play more in our FAMOUS bianconeri-shirt!

ps: why to get rid of Elkann?? they got billions...:weee:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 25)