being unable to make simple passes has nothing to do with the formation though.
But he is #2 in total key passes for our club last season. Look the numbers is fact, but your opinion is merely just your eye test.
So this is contradictional, how can someone that unable to make simple passes become #2 highest player in total of key passes for us last season. But, I can agree with you that he isnt what we looking for compare to his Atalanta days, we know what he can do, but he nowhere near that
Atalanta played in 3-4-1-2/3-4-2-1 formations, so mostly he is one of the AM there, and eventough they play with 3-4-1-2, their strikers mostly not pure striker, but forward for example Lookman
And look at CDK numbers before he join Atalanta with Milan, he played in 40 matches (total of 1481 minutes), mostly as a subs or starter then being subs at 60/70mins, he only got 0 goal and 1 assists all that season. Then when he join Atalanta, his numbers explode > 14 goals 11 assists (his first year loan + opt/obligation) 25 goals contribution in total, then 13 goals 13 assists in his 2nd year (last season) 26 goals contribution in total. How can he change so drastically, maybe he play without burden, no pressure,maybe continuity of play, feel happy, use at his best ability or he got detail instruction what he need to do on the field, something that he never got in Milan
And why this case is similar with Koop, because Koop is the antithesis, he lost touch, look clueless most of the time, and maybe he think why so easy at Atalanta but so hard here, while thinking this club should have better players at disposal