Terrorism (30 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,749
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
Well, unless you can un-brainwash hundreds of thousands of potential terrorists, then no.
Major terrorist threats have a distributed command and control built into their DNA through the use of semi-autonomous cells, etc. For those reasons, I don't think Osama is as relevant to ending any sort of war on terror as some might make it out to be.

There's enough opium fields in Arghanistan to fund a lot more terrorist activity than the Bin Laden family bank could. And from what I can tell of these organizations, there isn't a sort of alignment with a single, recognized leader. e.g., taking out Arafat doesn't necessarily disband the PLO (let alone Hamas, who doesn't really respect him anyway).
 
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
++ [ originally posted by swag ] ++


Major terrorist threats have a distributed command and control built into their DNA through the use of semi-autonomous cells, etc. For those reasons, I don't think Osama is as relevant to ending any sort of war on terror as some might make it out to be.
I have no idea what you are talking about, but it at least sounds cool.
 
OP

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #904
    ++ [ originally posted by BayernFussball ] ++
    I am not one to sympathize with terrorists who kill people because their "holy book" says so. That is like me being, yea Juve are a bunch of rich punks, go Turino!


    PS - Still not kidding.
    Could youmake an effort to actually get informed about the subjcet, or do you like being clueess?
     

    baggio

    Senior Member
    Jun 3, 2003
    19,250
    ++ [ originally posted by Majed ] ++

    About whether our chances of getting attacked again are more likely with Kerry as president, I disagree. It's completely illogical to think that Kerry will put less into national secuirity. The Damage has already been done Vinman. I don't think any of the two will make much of a difference. Maybe Nadar is the better option, but then again, I don't think he's that qualified to help the country economically..etc.
    I tend to agree when you say that its illogical to think that Kerry cant prevent an attack sooner than later. He has one thing Bush doesnt: the gift of hindsight. Kerry can improve the state of things because one must realise that the power of the US presidency should be complemented by intelligence, not aggression.

    Besides, Osama has beaten Bush all ends up, and i feel this new tape (where he runs down Bush) has been released in perfect timing, so as to unite people to vote for Bush, rather than against him because thats exactly what Osama wants. He knows the way Bush has worked in the past, and he knows how predictable Bush will continue to be. As far as national security goes, Osama knows the US army is spreading itself thin in lands abroad thanks to Bush, which leaves them vulnerable at home, and thats all he needs for a second, probably more fierceful attack than 9/11.
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,928
    ++ [ originally posted by baggio ] ++

    Besides, Osama has beaten Bush all ends up, and i feel this new tape (where he runs down Bush) has been released in perfect timing, so as to unite people to vote for Bush, rather than against him because thats exactly what Osama wants. He knows the way Bush has worked in the past, and he knows how predictable Bush will continue to be. As far as national security goes, Osama knows the US army is spreading itself thin in lands abroad thanks to Bush, which leaves them vulnerable at home, and thats all he needs for a second, probably more fierceful attack than 9/11.
    And you say his intentions are not killing as many Americans as possible Majed? No matter how you skew it, he wants to strike again in the U.S., killing as many as possible. Maybe it's not the only purpose, but it sure is the main one.
     

    gray

    Senior Member
    Moderator
    Apr 22, 2003
    30,260
    ++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
    And you say his intentions are not killing as many Americans as possible Majed? No matter how you skew it, he wants to strike again in the U.S., killing as many as possible. Maybe it's not the only purpose, but it sure is the main one.
    So you're saying that killing Americans is objective number one, then all of that stuff about gaining freedom for their nations is all a miscellaneous bonus? I don't really believe that
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,928
    ++ [ originally posted by gray ] ++

    So you're saying that killing Americans is objective number one, then all of that stuff about gaining freedom for their nations is all a miscellaneous bonus? I don't really believe that
    Like I said, its not the only objective. But to go through so much trouble to strike here at home, that seems to me like a full attempt to take out as many citizens as possible.
     

    gray

    Senior Member
    Moderator
    Apr 22, 2003
    30,260
    ++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
    Like I said, its not the only objective. But to go through so much trouble to strike here at home, that seems to me like a full attempt to take out as many citizens as possible.
    But again, why is he going to all that trouble to kill as many civilians as possible? Why, to send out the most resounding message possible, of course. Why would he go to all this trouble to kill people if he didn't have an objective (other than killing people)?
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,928
    ++ [ originally posted by gray ] ++

    But again, why is he going to all that trouble to kill as many civilians as possible? Why, to send out the most resounding message possible, of course. Why would he go to all this trouble to kill people if he didn't have an objective (other than killing people)?
    Why did the DC Snipers take out 13 people two years ago? Any reasons Graham? To kill people. I don't know what Bin Laden is really thinking, but one of his objectives is to kill people, and the other one is to free the muslim world of U.S. Occupation. But considering he supposedly "hated" Saddam, I don't think he would really give a rat's ass about Iraq. And if he did, he is just causing more trouble for the country and making the U.S. troops stay longer and longer. Reason why? Because he wants to kill Americans. I don't understand how you can't see this. It's as clear as day. More trouble he causes in the Middle East, the better chance he has to kill American troops. This task is now easier because they are already in the hell hole they call the middle east, and Osama can send his pathetic, worthless, henchman out in cars instead of planes. I sense this sort of sympathy towards his causes now, and its making me sick.
     

    baggio

    Senior Member
    Jun 3, 2003
    19,250
    Andy nobody sympathises with Osama. If anything, the entire world sympathised with America this whole time, until Bush took steps, only he can account for, and in the process managed to turn world favour away from the US. For that alone, i think Osama Bin Laden is a genius, whose proven over and over hes got the measure of George W. Bush.
    America is wrong for what it did in Iraq. I dont want to get in to the intricacies of the gulf war, but the way Bush has retaliated since 9\11, is only making things easier for Osama to accomplish his motives, whatever they may be.
     

    Majed

    Senior Member
    Jul 17, 2002
    9,630
    ++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


    Why did the DC Snipers take out 13 people two years ago? Any reasons Graham? To kill people.
    You can't use the DC killer to describe BL. Totally irrelavent.


    I don't know what Bin Laden is really thinking, but one of his objectives is to kill people, and the other one is to free the muslim world of U.S. Occupation.
    Andy, the sooner you and millions of others understand his logic and twisted way to acheive his goals, the better we'll be fighting him. I'll say this one more time. BL wants to "liberate" the Muslim world from US occupation and his means for doing so is by causing unrest to our national security just as he thinks that we caused unrest to the Muslim world's security. His means for destablizing our security is by attacking the united states. He attacked the Twin towers because they were the heart of the US.

    Andy, have you even read/heard his latest tape? He says all of this...

    Do you want me to start quoting him?!

    But considering he supposedly "hated" Saddam, I don't think he would really give a rat's ass about Iraq. And if he did, he is just causing more trouble for the country and making the U.S. troops stay longer and longer. Reason why? Because he wants to kill Americans.
    I don't understand how you can't see this. It's as clear as day. More trouble he causes in the Middle East, the better chance he has to kill American troops. This task is now easier because they are already in the hell hole they call the middle east, and Osama can send his pathetic, worthless, henchman out in cars instead of planes. I sense this sort of sympathy towards his causes now, and its making me sick.
    Yes. He gives a rats ass about the Iraqi people... he said so himself in his tape. I doubt it's the first time he said it either. (Note to people who always asume the worst in us members: BL cares for Iraqi women and children, yes. We care for Iraqi women and childredn, yes. Does this mean we are the same? NO)

    Does he want the US out of Iraq. Most likely, yes.
    If he was helping the Iraqi resistance and if he was associated with Abu Musab Al-Zargawi, then I'd say that they'd rather countinue with the current war situation in Iraq then to let a US-appointed government take hold of the country. He hate the monarchies and givernments in most Arab countries.

    Andy, again, we need to understand him better to fight him. Please, don't confuse our posts as sympathy when we're just making you more familiar with his mentality.
     

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
    ++ [ originally posted by baggio ] ++
    Andy nobody sympathises with Osama. If anything, the entire world sympathised with America this whole time, until Bush took steps, only he can account for, and in the process managed to turn world favour away from the US. For that alone, i think Osama Bin Laden is a genius, whose proven over and over hes got the measure of George W. Bush.
    America is wrong for what it did in Iraq. I dont want to get in to the intricacies of the gulf war, but the way Bush has retaliated since 9\11, is only making things easier for Osama to accomplish his motives, whatever they may be.
    Seems fairly obvious, doesn't it baggio? I wish more people would see it that way.
     

    swag

    L'autista
    Administrator
    Sep 23, 2003
    84,749
    <Sigh>

    Bin Laden :blah: :blah: :blah: Osama :blah: :blah: :blah:

    Am I the only one who -- despite the horrible things he's been behind in the past -- finds OBL to be little more than a windbag these days?

    All this guy does it seems is talk anymore. The guy should just get his own late night show and be done with it.
     

    Vinman

    2013 Prediction Cup Champ
    Jul 16, 2002
    11,482
    5 million American lives, that is Bin Laden's own statement as to what we owe him for all the grave "acts" we've committed


    5 million lives.............................
     

    swag

    L'autista
    Administrator
    Sep 23, 2003
    84,749
    In leiu of that, let's send him a handful of Chuck E. Cheese game tokens and a few 2-for-1 pizza coupons and call it even.

    As much as I disagree with what the U.S. is doing in Iraq right now, Osama is one to talk. Far from helping the people he claims to represent and wants to save, his actions are only serving to add to their insult and injury.
     

    Majed

    Senior Member
    Jul 17, 2002
    9,630
    ++ [ originally posted by swag ] ++
    In leiu of that, let's send him a handful of Chuck E. Cheese game tokens and a few 2-for-1 pizza coupons and call it even.

    As much as I disagree with what the U.S. is doing in Iraq right now, Osama is one to talk. Far from helping the people he claims to represent and wants to save, his actions are only serving to add to their insult and injury.
    Exactly...
     

    peckface

    approaching curve
    Oct 3, 2004
    2,357
    Why did he mention Sweden!! Now Bush will attack us to prove a point, but first he will say that we got weapons of massdestruction and that göran persson is an evil dictator :(
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,928
    ++ [ originally posted by pecker ] ++
    Why did he mention Sweden!! Now Bush will attack us to prove a point, but first he will say that we got weapons of massdestruction and that göran persson is an evil dictator :(
    Yeah thats exactly what we'll do. Bush will also make you guys play American Football just to put salt in your wounds. :rolleyes:
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 30)