Summer Mercato Thread 2020-21 (61 Viewers)

[Osman]

Why do you think Lacazette is better?

Better finisher, more technical, versatile, quicker, smart and dynamic attacker, the Lacazette I saw in Lyon was fantastic, never seen Milik perform like that.



Milik is still a good CF, just not a believer in him being a full time consistent player for a top club (I dont consider Napoli one).

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[U Picciriddu]

Oh defenitely, Laca is not a targetman, short technical poacher who is mobile and clever. Milik can fit better tactically. But Laca is objectively the better footballer. Not necessarily a need for Juve (IMO, I dont think Milik is a need for Juve either).

Milik is pretty complete, he’s not a Mandzukic type of player. Technically he’s solid, nice first touch and a powerful left foot. He’ll provide us some height in the enemy area which we need, but imo is also good in making combinations. He’s not my first choice, but I rate him more than Lacazette. They only Arsenal player I’m interested in is Auba.

Lets not forget that Arsenal nowadays is a mid-table team that doesn’t even plays CL anymore, Lacazette is at this age in his prime and he can leave there. He’d cost us more probably, although I think that his wages are the same as Milik (didn’t googled it tho).

And there’s the age difference that I don’t like. If Milik sucks we can sell him easily at 28, while Laca would be already 31/32.

 

[Osman]

I generally dont want either, just who I rate as technically better player.


Defenitely agree in Auba being a solid choice for us to get.

 

[Snobist]

We dont need to spend 40m on Milik even if we use Berna for a swap deal.

 

[RoiLezard]

The ideal scenario would be to hold on to Higuain for another year and go for Haaland next summer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Pirlo's Beard]

The ideal scenario would be to hold on to Higuain for another year and go for Haaland next summer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed

We're not going to get anything substantial for higgers so we might as well use him because any stop gap replacement will probably be a downgrade

 

[petszata]

The ideal scenario would be to hold on to Higuain for another year and go for Haaland next summer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Higuain finished in the summer of 2018. We need to get rid of him this summer.

 

[Sjaban]

And makes no sense to spend that much on a 29 yo backup striker.

Btw, can't believe he's 29 already.

Didn't even realise he's 29 already, another reason not to get him.

 

[Raphaël]

This abomination, a worst version of Pjanic, so Paratici will sign him

 

[.zero]

This abomination, so Paratici will sign him

The music makes this "highlight" reel watchable

 

[Claudio Gentile]

Better finisher, more technical, versatile, quicker, smart and dynamic attacker, the Lacazette I saw in Lyon was fantastic, never seen Milik perform like that.



Milik is still a good CF, just not a believer in him being a full time consistent player for a top club (I dont consider Napoli one).

We’ve all seen how players have an adjustment period when switching leagues. Would rather have Milik who will be cheaper and better off the hop. Laca is overrated

- - - Updated - - -

This abomination, a worst version of Pjanic, so Paratici will sign him

I have a feeling you don’t watch much football.

 

[Raphaël]

I have a feeling you don’t watch much football.

I'm like Lampard who prefers to start Gilmour instead of Jorginho, he mustn't see a lot of chelsea matchs

 

[Hust]

Juventus and Manchester City are interested in making a move for Adama Traore this summer. He's valued at £80m due to the remaining time on his Wolves contract. [ESPN]

 

[MikeM]

Buy young players that run fast and shoot hard.

 

[Hust]

lol does that guy juice?

 

[Gagi]

 

[Claudio Gentile]

I'm like Lampard who prefers to start Gilmour instead of Jorginho, he mustn't see a lot of chelsea matchs

Definitely wasn’t the case the first 30 games of the season. Lamp knows Jorginho is leaving.so why play him? Giving the 19 year old Gilmore much needed reps in the EPL.

 

[Raphaël]

Definitely wasn’t the case the first 30 games of the season. Lamp knows Jorginho is leaving.so why play him? Giving the 19 year old Gilmore much needed reps in the EPL.

So you're explainning to me that Chelsea, who plays a qualification for the next Champions League, prefer to deprive themselves of a great champion like Jorginho and put a newbie in the final sprint just to give him more reps in the EPL, ok why not.

 

[Bianconero81]

I don't understand this obsession/fascination with Jorginho. He's definitely not the player we need. Like many have stated, he'd probably come on high wages and have close to 0 resale value. He's also a player with a very limited skillset, not a signing that excites, or someone that makes the difference in midfield. Sure, he's a good passer, but we need more at this point. Sorri and Tootsie need to stop looking beyond the obvious and those scouts need to be doing their jobs finding young and exciting talent.

 

[Claudio Gentile]

So you're explainning to me that Chelsea, who plays a qualification for the next Champions League, prefer to deprive themselves of a great champion like Jorginho and put a newbie in the final sprint just to give him more reps in the EPL, ok why not.

Your saying you would rather have 19 year old Gilmore over Jorginho?