I agree regarding Benatia and Higuain. I disagree when it comes to Pjanic, unless it's a ridiculous offer or in exchange for a player of equal or superior quality.
Yeah, offer obviously has to be higher than what he's worth (rumored numbers are) AND replacement has to be better (or same but younger), which is true for any transfer.
- - - Updated - - -
I wonudnt say he's overrated. Cuadrado is much worse at right back for sure.
He's only good on the ball and only skill-wise. Makes poor decisions and passes. Poor defensively.
Cuadrado looked very promising at RB. We don't need to splash for a RB let alone signing another attacking one.
Ideal would be if the Benatia replacement can play RB too like Howedes. Then we'll have both attacking and defensive options.
- - - Updated - - -
Then i wonder why Barca and Madrid want him
- - - Updated - - -
That's a ridiculous statement
Ridiculous is this forum-wide goldfish memory syndrome. Till his injury, Matuidi was our most consistent and important CM who made the midfield and team balanced. Esp after we switched to 3 man mid.
That doesn't make him a Tardelli or Davids. He was the most consistent of a subpar bunch (by top team standards) while Pjanic was the best on a technical level.
- - - Updated - - -
I have decided that if it will happen, I will give disclosure of my sources (a few selected ones here, the ones I have met, know already, one has even met one of them as we went to the Stadium together)
Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
In what capacity are your sources in the know? Do they work for the club or work for someone who works for the club?