Summer mercato thread 2017-18 (44 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,016
Debatable and their careers speak otherwise. Paying €40m for Strootman if you already have Khedira is a total waste of money no matter how you look at it.
No, it's not, because they are totally different players.

Their careers? That surely isn't an indicator of ones potential/ability. D.Costa was in Bayern and Juve but Griezmann is a better player even if he's still at Atletico. Not to mention Borriello and his top clubs while him being total shit.

Spending money on Strootman would only be a waste if he gets injured. Otherwise he'd fit in instantly and surely provide a lot more than Khedira.
 

Stephan

Senior Member
Nov 9, 2005
16,643
In:

Spinazzola, R. Sanches (loan), Garay, Shick.

Out:

Asamoah, Sturaro (loan), Cuadrado.

And call it a mercato. :D
You forgot Marchisio.

- - - Updated - - -

The only way i would take Strootman is if we swap Cuadrado for him. I dont want to pay 40m or what ever for him otherwise. He missed 2 seasons almost entirely for Roma. 2 seasons guys! That just makes him very very risky move. With Cuadrado swap it would at least be a case of us getting extra mid for our needs and Cuadrado would get more playing time at Roma.


But that also makes me more suspicious about Marchisio future if we are desperate to sign Strootman. He will be competition for those guys. We dont just sign him for numbers.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,501
Roma has offered €38m to sign Schick. (Sky)

Well we wont be matching that. Its time for Schick to do a Keita and tell samp he only want Juve.
That makes no damn sense, both Juve and Inter only want Schick on loan deal, why would Roma directly offer nearly 40m for a player that there's such a question mark on? When they didnt offer that much for a much more needed Mahrez.
 
OP

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,662
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #19,090
    That makes no damn sense, both Juve and Inter only want Schick on loan deal, why would Roma directly offer nearly 40m for a player that there's such a question mark on? When they didnt offer that much for a much more needed Mahrez.
    maybe because it's another BS news?
     

    PhRoZeN

    Livin with Mediocre
    Mar 29, 2006
    16,931
    That makes no damn sense, both Juve and Inter only want Schick on loan deal, why would Roma directly offer nearly 40m for a player that there's such a question mark on? When they didnt offer that much for a much more needed Mahrez.
    Valid point.

    - - - Updated - - -

    I cant wait for the transfer window to close.
     

    s4tch

    Senior Member
    Mar 23, 2015
    33,735
    our squad at the moment:



    letting marchisio go wouldn't free up any space, except for the likes of marrone or de ceglie. if you want to have someone like strootman or n'zonzi, you have to sell either an italian trained player (e.g. sturaro) or some dude currently occupying a "free" spot (e.g. cuadrado or asamoah).
     

    Osman

    Koul Khara!
    Aug 30, 2002
    61,501
    We need to sign Spinazzola and take Sturaro out of CL list, then we would have 4 Fullbacks in list instead of just 3 with no Asa there.


    Plus Spinazzola counts as homegrown.
     

    s4tch

    Senior Member
    Mar 23, 2015
    33,735
    leaving pjaca out of the cl list would also make sense. he's injured and we're currently stacked on both flanks (provided cuadrado stays).

    we haven't had such an unpredictable mercato for years. we would have needed some fine tuning only, and it turns out that we're heading to an other transition year.
     

    s4tch

    Senior Member
    Mar 23, 2015
    33,735
    [video=twitter;899635023334088705]https://twitter.com/khaledalnouss1/status/899635023334088705[/video]

    :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

    it's getting even better.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 43)