Summer Mercato season 2023-24 (66 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ronn

Senior Member
May 3, 2012
20,915
Oh it’s happening lmao

The meltdown will take down the Tuz servers. I’m here for it.
Not sure who else Tuz had in mind to “replace” Dusan. It’s odd that nobody was worried about investments in the squad when we dropped 80m with 7m salary on Vlahovic.

- - - Updated - - -

Good for them. Smart move. Only we are retarded enough to go for this overrated turd of an oaf. Fuck this club.

- - - Updated - - -



Ah yes. No. Wrong. Vlahovic is 23. There is potential there and resale value. Lolcacku is a 30 year old never was. ZERO resale value and an expensive contract no one wants. This club never learns, and it's all because of that abominable shitcunt pseduo coach.
Dusan’s value will probably decline since we can’t fire Allegri. I think selling him right now is not a bad idea when he still has that “potential” aura around him.
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,853
Not sure who else Tuz had in mind to “replace” Dusan. It’s odd that nobody was worried about investments in the squad when we dropped 80m with 7m salary on Vlahovic.
cause he was young, promising, in very good form, and he was supposed to have a decent resale value if things go south (which is the case right now)

as for lukaku he's 30, missed like 20 games last season due to injury, dzeko benches him, he's fucking expensive, not to mention his salary, personality, history with juve, and he's an especially dumb mofo in a profession that is not very famous for the bright minds of its professionals

yes, he's an effective striker. and the list of positives end here. he's the request of a coach who shouldn't be here, was in his best form under conte (god save us from his return), failed at chelsea and manure, is a known choker, technically he's not even better than vlahovic, has zero resale value, etc. for me it makes literally zero sense
 

Tak!

Senior Member
Jun 23, 2011
4,180
Old. Benched for even older player (37 years old). ALWAYS misses important chances. Poor finisher. Injured consistently, fortunately mostly minor. Poor mentality. Focus on the wrong place. Drama queen.
Perfect for Juve.
He will fit well with Allegri's kick the ball to row Z tactics. Almost all our goals came from crosses last year, so he will also fit in our attack. But come on, a year from now when all fans finally pitched it and from a fundraiser where able to kick Allegri out. Then what? We're stuck with this dude and no one will want him. If there is even a tiny bit of truth to this I will have lost all hope. History repeats itself. We change people but lessons are never learned. Take back Secco, I'd rather be a laughing stock where I point and laugh together than being a part of it.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,023
I'm perfectly ok with Lukaku. We are selling Vlahovic and I don't see us buying a striker who'll provide more goals than Lukaku in the next two years. Let's face it, top 4 is the most we can hope for next year, and probably the following one too.
If we were allowed to play in CL, then I'd have been against this transfer. Against the Monzas and the Lecces in Italy, Lukaku's the man.

Unless he gets another injury. Then we're fucked.

No reinforcements for the midfield?
 

petszata

Junior Member
Jul 7, 2020
489
cause he was young, promising, in very good form, and he was supposed to have a decent resale value if things go south (which is the case right now)

as for lukaku he's 30, missed like 20 games last season due to injury, dzeko benches him, he's fucking expensive, not to mention his salary, personality, history with juve, and he's an especially dumb mofo in a profession that is not very famous for the bright minds of its professionals

yes, he's an effective striker. and the list of positives end here. he's the request of a coach who shouldn't be here, was in his best form under conte (god save us from his return), failed at chelsea and manure, is a known choker, technically he's not even better than vlahovic, has zero resale value, etc. for me it makes literally zero sense
There are always Saudis who can saves uf from this mistake!
 

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
69,035
Not sure who else Tuz had in mind to “replace” Dusan. It’s odd that nobody was worried about investments in the squad when we dropped 80m with 7m salary on Vlahovic.

- - - Updated - - -


Dusan’s value will probably decline since we can’t fire Allegri. I think selling him right now is not a bad idea when he still has that “potential” aura around him.
Jonathan David? or better more dont sell Vlahovic and tell Allegri to fucking fix it or gtfo
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,049
Not sure who else Tuz had in mind to “replace” Dusan. It’s odd that nobody was worried about investments in the squad when we dropped 80m with 7m salary on Vlahovic.

- - - Updated - - -


Dusan’s value will probably decline since we can’t fire Allegri. I think selling him right now is not a bad idea when he still has that “potential” aura around him.
It's not that odd. His resale value ain't dropping anytime soon and even one-good-season-out-of-four/five-Rabiot is on 7m.
 
Jun 16, 2020
12,435
I doubt this is true. But if it was it would be incredibly stupid to sign players specifically for a coach who has a high chance of not seeing out the season.

Also Lukaku missed 18 games last season. We need to stop adding to our I jury problems.
Sadly it seems like it is true. Nightmare transfer

- - - Updated - - -

I wouldn’t be against Lukaku.

Not really a fan favorite, but way better than Vlaho as a player
Quality wise maybe we’d even improve given Dusan’s form last year, but it’s such a dead transfer. The salary is awful and the players loyalty towards clubs even worse. This is a +100m investment if true, can’t we really find someone else for all that money.
 

GrandeGigi

Senior Member
Sep 18, 2012
1,891
Doesn’t surprise me that the dinosaur wants Lukaku. He can’t coach forwards and develop them so he would prefer to take the cop out option and swap for one who is accomplished at being able to hold the ball up under pressure and play long balls to.

If we buy that meme, that would likely be the final nail in the coffin for me.
 

Ronn

Senior Member
May 3, 2012
20,915
cause he was young, promising, in very good form, and he was supposed to have a decent resale value if things go south (which is the case right now)

as for lukaku he's 30, missed like 20 games last season due to injury, dzeko benches him, he's fucking expensive, not to mention his salary, personality, history with juve, and he's an especially dumb mofo in a profession that is not very famous for the bright minds of its professionals

yes, he's an effective striker. and the list of positives end here. he's the request of a coach who shouldn't be here, was in his best form under conte (god save us from his return), failed at chelsea and manure, is a known choker, technically he's not even better than vlahovic, has zero resale value, etc. for me it makes literally zero sense
He also cost 80m for a team badly needing an overhaul on pretty much every line.

- - - Updated - - -

It's not that odd. His resale value ain't dropping anytime soon and even one-good-season-out-of-four/five-Rabiot is on 7m.
Yes Rabiot insane contract is a good benchmark :baus:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 56)