Summer mercato 2021-22 (10 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

kappa96

Senior Member
Jun 20, 2018
6,899
Forget about halland and address the real issue. Sandro has been dreadful and he doesn't have any competition at lb.
Gosens and Kean would be enough.

Sent from my Mi 9T Pro using Tapatalk
 

petersmit

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2006
6,777
I really don't believe that we'll ever go for haaland. That fat pizza cunt will probably want 100M commission and because haaland is cheap (75m or something) he'll probably want 60m wages
 

IlCapitano

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2012
5,614
We have no chance at Haaland, forget about it. He's one of the most marketable players in the world, future best along with Mbappe, there is no way he comes to Serie A over EPL or LaLiga. City, RM, Barca, Bayern maybe, Man Utd will all be on him. He will get wages of 25m+ gross and will cost 75m in cash and Raiola will get another 20m + whatever for his father. We're not making that kind of investment so soon after Ronaldo. Our biggest problem were not the wages but amortization of costs.
 

singus

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2020
2,073
- Ramsay
- Rabiot
- Bentancur
- Mckennie

We should still get rid of 2 of these and get a clear starter in midfield, a left back and a player like Zapata to hold up the ball. Thats clearly the way Juve wants to play, especially with Chiellini and Bonucci still part of the team, tossing long balls up the field even when not under pressure.

- - - Updated - - -

Poor mercato but at least finally we are getting rid of some of the deadweight.

Who did we get rid off from the deadweight?

We still got Rugani, De Sciglio, Chiellini/Bonucci (one of them), Bentancur, Rabiot, Ramsay, Berna. No?

We actually got rid of: Ronaldo, Demiral, Romero and received more deadweight from the loans returning.
 
Last edited:

rainhard

Senior Member
May 5, 2004
3,917
You’d think that we’d learn our lesson with having one player on the book as expensive as 4 good other players. Within the same day of losing Ronaldo we’re already praying for Haaland
While we actually need Donnaruma, Gosens, SMS/De Paul and Vlahovic (especially on reasonable wages). Maybe not on the same mercato, but if we can offload our deadwood at their book values , some will covered by our U23 promotion. It is doable, but we need CR7 goes at the end of last season so we can planning a better mercato
 
Last edited:

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
32,490
Juventus only got around 15M€ from the sales of Ronaldo, generating a loss in the financial books of around 13-14M€ but saving around 50M€ before tax for his salary (instead of 60M€ if he would have left at the beginning of July) ⚫️⚪️ @guido_vaciago
People praising Bini and Bene for this ?
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
88,444
We have no chance at Haaland, forget about it. He's one of the most marketable players in the world, future best along with Mbappe, there is no way he comes to Serie A over EPL or LaLiga. City, RM, Barca, Bayern maybe, Man Utd will all be on him. He will get wages of 25m+ gross and will cost 75m in cash and Raiola will get another 20m + whatever for his father. We're not making that kind of investment so soon after Ronaldo. Our biggest problem were not the wages but amortization of costs.
Yep. The only way we get either Haaland or Mbappe is if/when they turn 32+
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
88,444
You’d think that we’d learn our lesson with having one player on the book as expensive as 4 good other players. Within the same day of losing Ronaldo we’re already praying for Haaland
But it's different. Haaland is the best or second best thing out of this generation, plus he's so young too. Even if we spent shitload he'd explode and selling him wouldn't be a huge deal. We signed an old Ronaldo so it was expected thing to happen.

We're not going to sign him but just sayin'
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)