Summer mercato 2021-22 (43 Viewers)

[rainhard]

Arent we already paid Boca 12M to revoke the clause ?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Orgut]

big gambling for zaniolo
maybe his playing style isn't suit his big body so his knee gave up
could change his playing style in for the sake of his future in football
remember ADP after his ACL injury? his speed decrease much

rather dani olmo or ryan gravenberg

Exactly and we dont have spare money at the moment. Zaniolo might be a gem of a signing but he could also be a waste of money due to injuries.
Better invest in someone who you know will improve the team and be a gem without any additional risks.

 

[s4tch]

Arent we already paid Boca 12M to revoke the clause ?

it was never officially confirmed

 

[TheLaz]

it was never officially confirmed

What if we swap him 1-1 with someone? How are they gonna get 50% of that?

 

[rainhard]

What if we swap him 1-1 with someone? How are they gonna get 50% of that?

Book value

Sent from my RMX1921 using Tapatalk

 

[s4tch]

What if we swap him 1-1 with someone? How are they gonna get 50% of that?

for accounting reasons, there are no classic swaps in football, and even if there was any, a valuation should be declared anyway. remember the caldara-bonucci "swap"? valuations were very similar, but two separate contracts were made. same goes for the spina-pellegrini, cancelo-danilo, pjanic-arthur deals. legally these are separate deals with their own terms, and a valuation always comes with a contract. even the payment terms are defined separately.

if the clause still exists, the only way to "trick" boca would be a double sale. sell both rugani and bentancur to atleti. their market value is let's say 2m + 40m, their contractual value could be different though: we sell rugani for 40, bentancur for 2, boca get 1m. (and never deal with juventus again lol) this is shady af but legal. never gonna happen.

 

[rainhard]

for accounting reasons, there are no classic swaps in football, and even if there was any, a valuation should be declared anyway. remember the caldara-bonucci "swap"? valuations were very similar, but two separate contracts were made. same goes for the spina-pellegrini, cancelo-danilo, pjanic-arthur deals. legally these are separate deals with their own terms, and a valuation always comes with a contract. even the payment terms are defined separately.

if the clause still exists, the only way to "trick" boca would be a double sale. sell both rugani and bentancur to atleti. their market value is let's say 2m + 40m, their contractual value could be different though: we sell rugani for 40, bentancur for 2, boca get 1m. (and never deal with juventus again lol) this is shady af but legal. never gonna happen.

We probably can do that with Berna + Bentancur. Because we get berna for 40

So we will still get plusvalenza from berna too

Probably Bentancur 15M Berna 35 M for 50 M players swap

Sent from my RMX1921 using Tapatalk

 

[s4tch]

Because we get berna for 40

that's irrelevant now, only the current book value matters

there's an other way to trick boca: we could sell bentancur for 6m to genoa with a buyback clause at 8m and immediately loan him back

 

[Osman]

@s4tch I remember Fiorentina had 50% sell on fee on Rebic who they used to have briefly and barely used. Frankfurt fucked them over said 50% by doing a straight swap with Milan for Andre Silva, they structured it as 2 year loan swaps lol. So Fiorentina got nothing lol. Except the 2m Frankfurt paid to sign him from Viola.



I know this cuz of a Viola fan who was pissed at the time lol. Maybe we can do something similar with Bentancur if its necessary. That is if Bentancurs clause is same as the one Rebic had.

 

[Akshen]

@s4tch I remember Fiorentina had 50% sell on fee on Rebic who they used to have briefly and barely used. Frankfurt fucked them over said 50% by doing a straight swap with Milan for Andre Silva. So Fiorentina got nothing lol.



I know this cuz of a Viola fan who was pissed at the time lol. Maybe we can do something similar with Bentancur if its necessary. That is if Bentancurs clause is same as the one Rebic had.

It works for the clause, but in this case we are not getting plusvalenza and these days we only sell to get it. Doubt any club would accept it too as they are also expecting plusvalenza, we would have to find a club who has a player with similiar situation to Bentacur.

 

[U Picciriddu]

Haha would be very nice

 

[juve123]

Haha would be very nice

Garbage journalism felix was bought for 130 million euros is nine years younger than Princess Dybala

 

[Bianconero81]

Haha would be very nice

I love Dybala, but this is a no brainer. Felix, even though he's inconsistent and hasn't had the greatest season, is still young and has room for growth/development/improvement.

 

[U Picciriddu]

Garbage journalism felix was bought for 130 million euros is nine years younger than Princess Dybala

Yea seems like a fairytale although if you look tot Felix’ book value, it might be possible. There’s also a big age difference between Pjanic and Arthur

 

[Bianconero81]

The only mids I would trade without Doubt would be Ramsay and Bentancur.

You'd keep the lazy, perennially out of shape, vastly overpaid Lolzilian Arturd?

 

[Bianconero81]

Digne, Caqueret, Vlahovic I would be happy with.

Too pasty. I'm getting Pussyfag vibes.

 

[Orgut]

Haha would be very nice

Sounds like bs..
Anyway we know how Dybala is under Allegri so an exchange wouldnt be such a bad idea. Felix? Sure but Atletico will never offer it..

 

[juve123]

Saul would like to leave AtleticoMadrid and Juventus have reportedly enquired about the player. [Marca]

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

We're gonna need at least one more winger? Preferably on the left. I wonder who that can be.

 

[juve123]

Gigio Donnarumma ever closer to joining Juventus. He's likely to wear the Juventus jersey next season. [Mediaset]