strikers (7 Viewers)

Jules

Junior Member
Apr 14, 2003
103
#61
The problem with Di Vaio over Vialli is difficult. The thing to remember is that those were different times, when Vialli was playing. Today, there is more money, more options, and more players fighting for space on teams. Plus, more games that end up meaning a whole lot more.

So, a team bck then could afford to wait out the progress of a player like Vialli. Now, how much can we afford to sit back and wait for Di Vaio to find his form? We need options, and options that actually work for us. Di Vaio was more of a deperate buy, a last minute morale booster. I don't see that as having worked well.

Over the last few years, Juve has used less and less intelligence when buying strikers. Di Vaio was another example of this.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Zizou

Senior Member
Apr 21, 2003
3,965
#62
Jules give Di Vaio some time, after all, before his last injury he was quite in form and everyone was saying how well he was playing.

When Juve bought him, we did require a strikre, so it was an intelligent move as there weren't many other better strikers around.
 

Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,985
#63
THis have nothing to do, but since i remember....after that head injury in the newcastle clash (remember the one that knocked him), he is not the same. That fukin newcastle defdender damaged the aim of divaio.
Now he is unable to see the enemy´s goal.
 

Stu

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
17,557
#64
++ [ originally posted by Zizou ] ++
Jules give Di Vaio some time, after all, before his last injury he was quite in form and everyone was saying how well he was playing.

When Juve bought him, we did require a strikre, so it was an intelligent move as there weren't many other better strikers around.
Why not Mutu!?!?!?!? :(:(:(:(
 

Reza

Junior Member
Jul 13, 2002
266
#65
hey gang , don't u think lippi should give more chance to zalayetta .
he was really cold when he scored that vital goal and obviously it's meaningful.
 

Zizou

Senior Member
Apr 21, 2003
3,965
#66
++ [ originally posted by -Fantasista- ] ++


Why not Mutu!?!?!?!? :(:(:(:(
Cos he's not a striker, and we needed a striker that could replace Trezegol till he was injured ;)

Still I like Mutu alot, and wouldn't mind him joining us.
 
Jul 12, 2002
5,666
#67
++ [ originally posted by Reza ] ++
hey gang , don't u think lippi should give more chance to zalayetta .
he was really cold when he scored that vital goal and obviously it's meaningful.
Nope. Zala is a sub-par striker, we need more quality. He may come through now and again, but we can and should do better.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 7)