[SPA] La Liga 2009/2010 (20 Viewers)
- Thread starter Azzurri7
- Start date
Eℓvin;2030241 said:
Holy fuck, this is the most exciting transfer window ever.
Honestly, Real makes football more fun
Honestly, Real makes football more fun
Why?
Whoa, I didn't know that actually, weird because weren't they at different clubs? Because when Quaresma was at Sporting it was at a different time than Ronaldo, no?
I suppose but Quaresma even when he played for Chel$ki, and was brought on for making an impact on the game and he failed to do so. Oh well, who knows what'll happen because he's never been given the time. He should have just accepted the move to Genoa, too bad for him iSuppose.
Whoa, I didn't know that actually, weird because weren't they at different clubs? Because when Quaresma was at Sporting it was at a different time than Ronaldo, no?I suppose but Quaresma even when he played for Chel$ki, and was brought on for making an impact on the game and he failed to do so. Oh well, who knows what'll happen because he's never been given the time. He should have just accepted the move to Genoa, too bad for him iSuppose.
I think this move might make Ronaldo less hateable for me.The whole thing about a cunt being at the biggest club in the world with the most pompus supporters out there made him unbearable.
Now that's he's going to a club trying to regain it's lost glory,away from the biased EPL and English Media,i might even start liking him.
Oh and i would love to see when Andy Gray has a go at him for diving against an Enlgish Opposition.
Now that's he's going to a club trying to regain it's lost glory,away from the biased EPL and English Media,i might even start liking him.
Oh and i would love to see when Andy Gray has a go at him for diving against an Enlgish Opposition.
Why? Whoa, I didn't know that actually, weird because weren't they at different clubs? Because when Quaresma was at Sporting it was at a different time than Ronaldo, no?
I suppose but Quaresma even when he played for Chel$ki, and was brought on for making an impact on the game and he failed to do so. Oh well, who knows what'll happen because he's never been given the time. He should have just accepted the move to Genoa, too bad for him iSuppose.
Whoa, I didn't know that actually, weird because weren't they at different clubs? Because when Quaresma was at Sporting it was at a different time than Ronaldo, no?I suppose but Quaresma even when he played for Chel$ki, and was brought on for making an impact on the game and he failed to do so. Oh well, who knows what'll happen because he's never been given the time. He should have just accepted the move to Genoa, too bad for him iSuppose.
Chelsea brought quaresma in january, no?...so the game relations were made up between the players, the time wasn't on his side as u said...he could not interfere in the core of chelsea..that's why he didn't made an impact. And i think it's a good move by not going to genoa..better to fight his way at a top club.
