Some serious tuning (12 Viewers)

swag

swag

L'autista
Administrator
#24
Sep 23, 2003
84,778
#24
Those came out about a year ago. Funny how Ford immediately pulled them, saying that, "They were never intended for public release."

Right. Someone just decided to drop a few million dollars of TV commercial production cash on a practical joke. :rolleyes:
 
Slagathor

Slagathor

Bedpan racing champion
#28
Jul 25, 2001
22,708
#28
Oh yeah.

Citroen never really evolved enough from the 2CV - they're a hazzard on wheels. Cheap and a nice ride, but a hazzard nonetheless.
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
#31
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
#31
The new C4?

Why not? They got 5 starts at the NCAP crash tests, have pretty good handling and brakes? Why do you think they're unsafe?
 
swag

swag

L'autista
Administrator
#38
Sep 23, 2003
84,778
#38
++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++
The new C4?

Why not? They got 5 starts at the NCAP crash tests, have pretty good handling and brakes? Why do you think they're unsafe?
Click to expand...
As an aside, that kind of product marketing has been heavy in the U.S. -- particularly since the early 90s, which seemed to be one of the peaks of fear- and paranoia-based marketing. For some reason, in this day and age of terrorism awareness, it has kind of taken a back seat and people are being a bit more rational with their car buying criteria -- taking a more balanced view.

There once was a time here that, based on the advertising messages of car manufacturers, you thought cars were merely built to destroy. Didn't matter if it drove like crap, if it looked like a reject from the clown college parking lot, and if it could actually drive uphill. All that mattered was that you could ram it into a wall at 60mph and not everyone would die.

Not that I don't think it's important, but it should hardly be the only thing.
 
Slagathor

Slagathor

Bedpan racing champion
#39
Jul 25, 2001
22,708
#39
lol excellent post

Would have been better if the emphasis had lied on 'everyone' though :D

++ [ originally posted by swag ] ++
As an aside, that kind of product marketing has been heavy in the U.S. -- particularly since the early 90s, which seemed to be one of the peaks of fear- and paranoia-based marketing. For some reason, in this day and age of terrorism awareness, it has kind of taken a back seat and people are being a bit more rational with their car buying criteria -- taking a more balanced view.

There once was a time here that, based on the advertising messages of car manufacturers, you thought cars were merely built to destroy. Didn't matter if it drove like crap, if it looked like a reject from the clown college parking lot, and if it could actually drive uphill. All that mattered was that you could ram it into a wall at 60mph and not everyone would die.

Not that I don't think it's important, but it should hardly be the only thing.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 12)